public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rebecca Cran" <rebecca@bsdio.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, spbrogan@outlook.com, "Kinney,
	Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kubacki, Michael" <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>,
	gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] failed Pr
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 09:43:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <64a286dd-5145-4dab-aed5-f4dbd3f96c9d@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BY3PR19MB4900B4A8D1DBD7381EFF5F96C84A9@BY3PR19MB4900.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>

I pay for a Visual Studio subscription, so I shouldn’t count towards the limit then.
My GitHub email address is the same as I use here.

— 
Rebecca

On Mon, May 29, 2023, at 9:37 AM, Sean wrote:
> It has changed over time and I no longer see a button on the "checks" 
> page of GitHub.  I only see the button in the azure pipeline which 
> would mean maintainers would need to be "contributors" in the azure 
> DevOps organization/project. I have no problem with that and it looks 
> like you can sign in with a GitHub account so it should just be a 
> matter of collecting the email address associated with their GitHub and 
> inviting them to join.  We only get 5 free basic users but we get 
> unlimited free "stakeholder" accounts. I assume we might need basic 
> accounts to interact with the pipeline stuff but I don't know for sure. 
>  Anyone who has paid Microsoft visual studio subscriptions (like from 
> an employer) usually doesn't count towards the 5.   
>
> Regardless for those actively contributing and interested we should add 
> them up to the limit.  This was one of the reasons we had desired long 
> term to align on GitHub build services instead.
>
> Other thoughts?
>
> Thanks
> Sean 
> *From:* Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2023 8:13:32 AM
> *To:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; spbrogan@outlook.com 
> <spbrogan@outlook.com>; ardb@kernel.org <ardb@kernel.org>; Rebecca Cran 
> <rebecca@bsdio.com>
> *Cc:* Kubacki, Michael <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>; Gao, Liming 
> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; Kinney, Michael D 
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [edk2-devel] failed Pr 
> 
> Hi Sean,
>
> 
>
> Do you know what GitHub permissions are required to see the re-run button?
>
> 
>
> I think it is reasonable for all Maintainers to have that available.
>
> 
>
> Mike
>
> 
>
> *From:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> * On Behalf Of *Sean
> *Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2023 8:12 AM
> *To:* devel@edk2.groups.io; ardb@kernel.org; Rebecca Cran 
> <rebecca@bsdio.com>
> *Cc:* devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D 
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael 
> <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>; Gao, Liming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] failed Pr
>
> 
>
> It has been rerun. 
>
> 
>
> *From:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> on behalf of Ard 
> Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, May 29, 2023 7:44:37 AM
> *To:* Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com>
> *Cc:* devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Michael Kinney 
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Michael Kubacki 
> <michael.kubacki@microsoft.com>; Liming Gao (Byosoft address) 
> <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> *Subject:* Re: [edk2-devel] failed Pr 
>
> 
>
> On Mon, 29 May 2023 at 16:37, Rebecca Cran <rebecca@bsdio.com> wrote:
>>
>> It looks like the agent or machine running the CI task crashed.
>>
>> "##[error]We stopped hearing from agent Azure Pipelines 18. Verify the
>> agent machine is running and has a healthy network connection. Anything
>> that terminates an agent process, starves it for CPU, or blocks its
>> network access can cause this error. For more information, see:
>> https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=846610" <https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=846610%22>
>>
>
> Hmm, it would be nice if this thing could distinguish between 'error
> in your code' and 'internal error' where the latter does not mark your
> PR as being rejected.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The only way I've found to make CI run again is to do something to cause
>> the commit hash to change, for example by making a change to ReadMe.rst
>> then reverting it.
>>
>
> Mike Kinney mentioned last time that there is a button I could push. Mike?
>
> I am reluctant to make unnecessary changes to the state of the branch
> just to trick the CI into having another go at it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-29 15:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-29 12:48 failed Pr Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 12:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Attar, AbdulLateef (Abdul Lateef)
2023-05-29 14:37 ` Rebecca Cran
2023-05-29 14:44   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-29 15:12     ` Sean
2023-05-29 15:13       ` Michael D Kinney
2023-05-29 15:37         ` Sean
2023-05-29 15:43           ` Rebecca Cran [this message]
2023-05-29 16:44           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-05-30 14:36             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 15:34               ` Michael D Kinney
2023-05-30 15:45                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-05-30 17:26                   ` Michael D Kinney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-06-02 16:19 failed pr Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-02 16:36 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael D Kinney
2023-06-02 16:38   ` Michael D Kinney
2023-06-02 22:32     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-02 23:38       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-03  0:07         ` Michael D Kinney
2023-06-06 19:55           ` Michael D Kinney
2023-06-06 21:37             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-07  2:02             ` Wu, Hao A
2023-06-07  3:07               ` Michael D Kinney
2023-06-07  3:15                 ` Wu, Hao A
2023-06-07 15:09                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-07 15:39                     ` Rebecca Cran
2023-06-07 17:00                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-06-07 17:02                         ` Rebecca Cran
2023-06-07 17:03                           ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=64a286dd-5145-4dab-aed5-f4dbd3f96c9d@app.fastmail.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox