From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81])
 by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.7816.1589296194771588405
 for <devel@edk2.groups.io>;
 Tue, 12 May 2020 08:09:56 -0700
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=fVfDXU5t;
 spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.81, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1589296193;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=zJ619QdZzBmRSw3wwyQcWEvIM/ALWvXF/YRXtywhIYM=;
	b=fVfDXU5tHZsKOOBc2K56bIV8hcOqhxP4+EXXN+3PY1RkiVLjnk/Ozv7e3MbLjF8LWEspMQ
	HBmO7ESv0rEv3LQZG7UBr1asOJuFOAu/W/XXZ96VOjoF83OmurdrEEs5VzddDilQ1M0OEo
	MckSwZMvi0rRC/sUHNG2FQJVj4HySzs=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com
 [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id
 us-mta-65-olmFENl_PgOgPAneJPz97g-1; Tue, 12 May 2020 11:09:49 -0400
X-MC-Unique: olmFENl_PgOgPAneJPz97g-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42CC107ACF2;
	Tue, 12 May 2020 15:09:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-114-120.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.120])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9087D8F1;
	Tue, 12 May 2020 15:09:45 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Where to put the bhyve code in the edk2 repo: BhyvePkg, or under OvmfPkg?
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>, Rebecca Cran
 <rebecca@bsdio.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>,
 "Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
References: <MN2PR11MB4461FF31AA0D74FE8495EC1DD2A10@MN2PR11MB4461.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <20CE2FEE-3844-422E-8DB2-2784C9B56CE9@bsdio.com>
 <2de7aa2e-a024-3c2b-14c0-161e68c31121@redhat.com>
 <c4b6a53e-06b3-6a68-fa85-d043f5946457@arm.com>
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <671a668a-fa5c-af15-c208-2d4ae64254ae@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 17:09:45 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c4b6a53e-06b3-6a68-fa85-d043f5946457@arm.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 05/12/20 11:52, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:

> If nobody is invested enough in a platform to notice that is gets
> broken, I don't think we should put the burden on other maintainers to
> take responsibility for that.

I meant to say the same thing.

(I could try to explain how your words map -- IMO -- 1:1 to my
UefiCpuPkg example, but I guess I won't risk even more confusion. So
I'll just say "I agree".)

Thanks
Laszlo