From: "Michael Kubacki" <mikuback@linux.microsoft.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com, "Kinney,
Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
'Leif Lindholm' <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>,
'Andrew Fish' <afish@apple.com>
Cc: 'Sean Brogan' <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] CodeQL and Apache Licensed Files
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2023 12:07:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <68b71576-2395-4ea0-a313-ae86de0f21a3@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7233ece-48ec-3741-b512-daf66c4b8e26@redhat.com>
On 10/28/2023 7:51 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 10/27/23 23:11, Michael Kubacki wrote:
>> I'd like to bring attention to Apache License 2.0 code in the CodeQL
>> series I sent to the mailing list for steward review.
>>
>> In particular, the files in the BaseTools/Plugin/CodeQL/analyze
>> directory of this patch:
>>
>> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/109696
>>
>> Please let me know if any next steps are needed.
>
> (1) I don't know if edk2 accepts contributions under Apache License 2.0;
> just want to point out that this license is acceptable in Fedora (and so
> RHEL too), per
> <https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/>. Assuming
> we're talking about "Apache Software License 2.0".
>
A few submodules are using the Apache License 2.0.
For example, OpenSSL v3:
- https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
- https://git.openssl.org/?p=openssl.git;a=blob_plain;f=LICENSE.txt;hb=HEAD
And cmoocka:
- https://gitlab.com/cmocka/cmocka/-/blob/master/COPYING
I'm unaware if there was precedent specific to submodules, but I'd
expect terms like redistribution clauses to already apply regardless of
tooling used to acquire the source code into the project.
> (2) Should we extend "License Details" and "Code Contributions" in
> "ReadMe.rst"?
>
My initial thought was to add the path (BaseTools\Plugin\CodeQL\analyze)
to "License Details".
Was that all that you had in mind or to elaborate further in that
section on the licenses used/allowed?
> (3) Should the new files (under Apache License 2.0) use an SPDX
> identifier tag, for easy greppability?
>
I'd be happy to add that.
> (4) With the addition, downstream packages (such as RPMs in Fedora and
> RHEL) might want to spell out the short SPDX identifier of the new
> license too in their License: tags.
>
> Laszlo
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#110433): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/110433
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/102230244/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-31 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-27 21:11 [edk2-devel] CodeQL and Apache Licensed Files Michael Kubacki
2023-10-28 11:51 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-10-31 16:07 ` Michael Kubacki [this message]
2023-10-31 17:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-10-31 19:19 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-10-31 19:34 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-10-31 19:45 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-10-31 21:29 ` Michael Kubacki
2023-10-31 19:22 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-10-31 19:42 ` Michael D Kinney
2023-10-31 19:49 ` Pedro Falcato
2023-11-01 11:11 ` Leif Lindholm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=68b71576-2395-4ea0-a313-ae86de0f21a3@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox