From: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
To: "Gao, Zhichao" <zhichao.gao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] ShellPkg: Document the use of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER by two functions
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 08:09:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <692bf71f-dd33-d8db-914c-2867845434ac@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3CE959C139B4C44DBEA1810E3AA6F9000B8BF8A5@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Hi Zhichao,
On 1/7/20 8:01 AM, Gao, Zhichao wrote:
> Sorry for late response:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2019 10:10 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
>> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Gao, Zhichao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>;
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] ShellPkg: Document the use of
>> EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER by two functions
>>
>> Complete the list of values the functios ParseCommandLineToArgs() and
>> UpdateArgcArgv() can return.
>>
>> The documentation was found to be incomplete while reviewing BZ#2395:
>> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/51512
>>
>> v2:
>> - Shortened patch #1 subject to fit 72 chars
>
> The subject should be less than 72 chars (do not include 72 chars).
What is the rationale for this restriction? Some tool limitation?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-07 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-19 14:09 [PATCH v2 0/2] ShellPkg: Document the use of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER by two functions Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-19 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ShellPkg: Document ParseCommandLineToArgs returns EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-12-19 14:09 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ShellPkg: Document UpdateArgcArgv " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-07 7:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ShellPkg: Document the use of EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER by two functions Gao, Zhichao
2020-01-07 7:09 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé [this message]
2020-01-07 7:37 ` Gao, Zhichao
2020-01-21 11:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-01-31 5:31 ` [edk2-devel] " Gao, Zhichao
2020-02-04 23:04 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2020-02-11 12:16 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=692bf71f-dd33-d8db-914c-2867845434ac@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox