From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [207.211.31.81]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web09.3344.1578387627876422220 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 01:00:28 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Xin0Cb/G; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 207.211.31.81, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1578387627; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=dUXrcbQT0VxmmT9DBUx3tDvdxA1EPHt3epENfa5t4vY=; b=Xin0Cb/GW8IJzudoevUEIULjQwxCxd9sGDh3TnupUE4tJJvOOZck4Z0ealaDdqSmKXeo54 zTYpESKTQVDw4gxD0d39Gr/DneE1cS2Ze3MIm019ZrOsBaKyBGX+0gn/bhdQ4gBEClHvMd 6WAe5IuWxYzYbfqqQ3vfaU36AzIgWzA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-149-mBtINMIMPxS5ID9QsI6vYw-1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 04:00:22 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFA6801E72; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-117-126.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.126]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DB27FB53; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 09:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] EDK II Maintainers - EDK II CI is now active on edk2/master To: "Kinney, Michael D" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , Sean Brogan , Bret Barkelew , "Gao, Liming" References: <1443759e-a8a1-2c5f-4892-0ff740e948ba@redhat.com> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: <69b8aeff-9af0-6ff6-b806-f7ac0d64f76a@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:00:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-MC-Unique: mBtINMIMPxS5ID9QsI6vYw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Mike, On 01/06/20 19:17, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > Laszlo, > > Sorry for the delay in getting to these PactchCheck.py updates. > I know it is frustrating to be blocked by these types of issues. > I try to look at 2406 tomorrow. Thanks! > I think the manual override is > potentially more complex to implement than the requested changed > to PatchCheck.py. OK. > > You were on the correct link. If you clicked one more level on > "Bash exited with code '255'" link on that web page, it takes you > to the patch check log that shows 3 errors for commit message > subject lines being too long. > > https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/edk2-ci/_build/results?buildId=3459&view=logs&j=12f1170f-54f2-53f3-20dd-22fc7dff55f9&t=9c939e41-62c2-5605-5e05-fc3554afc9f5&l=149 Thanks for this info as well. I have two comments, one specific and one general ("rambling"). (1) The specific comment: the above link does not work for me. I get: An unexpected error has occurred within this region of the page. You can try reloading this component or refreshing the entire page. with two buttons: [Refresh page] [Reload component] Neither helps -- the result is the same. Then, if I click "Show more info", I get: Error: 'block' member of ScrollIntoViewOptions 'center' is not a valid value for enumeration ScrollLogicalPosition. Stack in i in t in div in t in li ... The result is the same if I start with the link from yesterday: https://dev.azure.com/tianocore/11ea4a10-ac9f-4e5f-8b13-7def1f19d478/_build/results?buildId=3456 and then indeed click the "Bash exited with code '255'" link. Worse, even the github.com link that I posted myself yesterday: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/272/checks?check_run_id=375969977 has stopped working now. Apparently failed CI runs are superseded by successful ones, and we can no longer refer to historic failures. This is not very helpful (in particular for the CI system's developers, I'd think!). (2) The general comment. In the old [X]HTML days, a button looked like a button, and a link looked like a link. Today, on the Modern Web (TM), visual cues as to whether a UI element is "active" or not, are unpredictable. To me anyway. There are too many colors, and the active elements frequently lack a consistent trait -- even within a single web page -- that advertises "I'm active, click me", without the user hovering over them with the mouse pointer. My question here is whether this is - just me, - my background (~ textual terminals), - my generation (Gen X, let's say). I feel like UI design has fallen off a cliff in recent years. (Bonus offense: text that cannot be selected for copy & paste. For example, I cannot highlight the "Bash exited with code '255'" link, for copying that caption into this email. I have to re-type it manually.) Thanks Laszlo