From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=217.140.101.70; helo=foss.arm.com; envelope-from=julien.grall@arm.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from foss.arm.com (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70]) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7792194EB76 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA1EA78; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.37.12.84] (unknown [10.37.12.84]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B0123F59C; Thu, 14 Mar 2019 12:06:16 -0700 (PDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , "Kinney, Michael D" Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , Ard Biesheuvel , Jordan Justen , Anthony Perard , =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , Stefan Berger , Lars Kurth References: From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <6de07821-a05e-9446-7ef6-c178eaf2fdfb@arm.com> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:06:14 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:06:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (+ Lars) On 3/14/19 10:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/13/19 18:54, Kinney, Michael D wrote: > (2.2.2) Files that seem to be covered by the MIT license. > > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-arm/xen.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen-x86_32.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen-x86_64.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/event_channel.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/grant_table.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/hvm/hvm_op.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/hvm/params.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/blkif.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/console.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/protocols.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/ring.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/xenbus.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/xs_wire.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/memory.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/xen-compat.h > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/xen.h > OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenBus.c > OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenStore.c > OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenStore.h > > It's OK to leave these untouched, for now. Later, we should > probably replace their license blocks with > "SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT" (as appropriate). It might make > sense to file a TianoCore BZ about them immediately, with a > BZ-dependency on BZ#1373. I have added Lars Kurth to confirm the license. > > (2.2.3) The following file is untouched, but it should be updated. It > requires special (not scripted) treatment. > > OvmfPkg/License.txt > > (2.2.4) The following files seem to be under 2-BSDL, but without a link > to -- which is > why I believe the script must have missed them. They should be > converted manually. > > OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/GrantTable.c > OvmfPkg/XenPvBlkDxe/BlockFront.c That's correct, they are licensed under 2-clause BSD. Cheers, -- Julien Grall