From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>, edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT()
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:02:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6e4f61bc-fdc0-a08c-c38a-b9e7696b5a2b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477029024-31932-1-git-send-email-dennis.chen@arm.com>
On 10/21/16 07:50, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Since All the GIC base address variables has been aligned to 64-bit, it
> doesn't make sense to continue use MAX_UINT32 in ASSERT() statement, so
> this patch uses MAX_UINTN to adapt to this kind of change.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> ---
> ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> index 64afc4d..6488061 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> @@ -79,11 +79,11 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>
> // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
> DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> - ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> + ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>
> // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
> RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> - ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> + ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINTN);
>
> PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
> PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
> @@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>
> DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> CpuBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> - ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> - ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
> + ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINTN);
> + ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINTN);
>
> PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
> PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
>
Ard, can you please handle this iteration of the patch as well?
I do have one suggestion, for the subject:
ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtGicArchLib: adapt ASSERT()s to 64-bit base addresses
If you guys agree, I think it can be done on commit. With that,
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-21 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-21 5:50 [RESEND PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Bit width adaption in ASSERT() Dennis Chen
2016-10-21 8:02 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-10-21 8:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-10-24 3:01 ` Dennis Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6e4f61bc-fdc0-a08c-c38a-b9e7696b5a2b@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox