public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, marc.zyngier@arm.com
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, leif.lindholm@linaro.org,
	Drew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, Wei Huang <wei@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/TimerDxe: Always perform an EOI, even for spurious interrupts
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 15:25:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70195198-34e4-5711-8534-abccad6068dd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180306132424.25961-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

On 03/06/18 14:24, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>
> The generic timer driver only EOIs the timer interrupt if
> the ISTATUS bit is set. This is completely fine if you pretend
> that spurious interrupts do not exist. But as a matter of fact,
> they do, and the first one will leave the interrupt activated
> at the GIC level, making sure that no other interrupt can make
> it anymore.
>
> Making sure that each interrupt Ack is paired with an EOI is the
> way to go. Oh, and enabling the interrupt each time it is taken
> is completely pointless. We entered this function for a good
> reason...
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
>  ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> index 2416c90f5545..33d7c922221f 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> @@ -306,12 +306,13 @@ TimerInterruptHandler (
>    //
>    OriginalTPL = gBS->RaiseTPL (TPL_HIGH_LEVEL);
>
> +  // Signal end of interrupt early to help avoid losing subsequent ticks
> +  // from long duration handlers
> +  gInterrupt->EndOfInterrupt (gInterrupt, Source);
> +
>    // Check if the timer interrupt is active
>    if ((ArmGenericTimerGetTimerCtrlReg () ) & ARM_ARCH_TIMER_ISTATUS) {
>
> -    // Signal end of interrupt early to help avoid losing subsequent ticks from long duration handlers
> -    gInterrupt->EndOfInterrupt (gInterrupt, Source);
> -
>      if (mTimerNotifyFunction) {
>        mTimerNotifyFunction (mTimerPeriod * mElapsedPeriod);
>      }
> @@ -339,9 +340,6 @@ TimerInterruptHandler (
>      ArmGenericTimerEnableTimer ();
>    }
>
> -  // Enable timer interrupts
> -  gInterrupt->EnableInterruptSource (gInterrupt, Source);
> -
>    gBS->RestoreTPL (OriginalTPL);
>  }
>
>

It is spooky to see this patch on edk2-devel :)

In RHEL-7 ArmVirtQemu (aka "AAVMF"), we had carried a somewhat similar
patch, for a long time.

I originally added it in Feb 2015, after we rebased our aarch64 host
kernel from 3.18.<whatever> to 3.19.<somethingelse>. That host kernel
(incl. KVM) rebase broke guest UEFI *reboot*. We figured it was a KVM
regression -- but, because we couldn't figure out the exact KVM problem,
we plastered it over in the guest firmware, a bit similarly to the
above. This was done for RHBZ#1188054.

We reported the issue to several KVM people (off-list -- maybe that
wasn't a great idea, sorry!); you might find the thread under msgid
<54D3796E.1040907@redhat.com>, subject "virtual timer interrupt stuck
across guest firmware reboot on KVM", in your 2015 archives :)

At the same time, we filed RHBZ#1189429 for tracking the KVM problem, so
that once the host kernel got fixed, we could backport those patches,
and revert the guest firmware kludge.

The host kernel (KVM) fix was
<https://marc.info/?i=1440942866-23802-1-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>:

  [PATCH 0/9] Rework architected timer and fix UEFI reset

And, indeed we dropped the "AAVMF" kludge (which revert was separately
tracked under RHBZ#1259395).

So it looks like spurious timer interrupts exists on phys hardware as
well -- I guess I should have attempted to upstream the guest fw patch
back then, after all. We might have ended up with an improved version of
it that could have now covered this recent symptom too, perhaps.

Quoting my downstream patch under my sig for reference.

For this patch:

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo

PS: some of the RHBZs listed above are "private" -- sorry about that,
the rules are arcane, and for mere developers like yours truly, there's
a certain element of "better safe than sorry" to it.

> From 58351b83d3f8badb8f0e44f70b06cfbba9644d20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:53:53 +0100
> Subject: [RHELSA AAVMF PATCH 1/1] ArmPkg: TimerDxe: smack down spurious timer
>  interrupt (RHELSA hack)
>
> Message-id: <1423155233-22668-2-git-send-email-lersek@redhat.com>
> Patchwork-id: 63732
> O-Subject:  [RHELSA AAVMF PATCH 1/1] ArmPkg: TimerDxe: smack down spurious timer
> 	interrupt (RHELSA hack)
> Bugzilla: 1188054
> Acked-by: Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: wei@redhat.com
> Acked-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
>
> When an aarch64 KVM guest is rebooted with the UEFI shell command "reset
> -c", the instance of AAVMF that runs after the reboot hangs in the timer
> driver. We tracked this issue unto a virtual timer interrupt that remains
> stuck / asserted across the reboot for some reason, and is delivered to
> the handler function in TimerDxe *before* TimerDxe is done setting up data
> for the handler and unmasks the interrupt. This happens to cause an
> infinite loop in the handler.
>
> The above situation should never emerge (an interrupt, stuck or not,
> should never be delivered while it is masked). This could be a KVM bug --
> which we track with clone bug 1189429 and reported privately to ARM &
> Linaro people --, but until the root cause gets sorted out, we need to
> move forward with AAVMF. Attempts to clear interrupt lines up-front have
> borne no fruit. Hence we enable the handler to cope with a spurious
> interrupt.
>
> Downstream only. Should be reverted when 1189429 is fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> ---
>  ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c b/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> index d0a819fc2729..f57b7acf424f 100644
> --- a/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> +++ b/ArmPkg/Drivers/TimerDxe/TimerDxe.c
> @@ -313,6 +313,12 @@ TimerInterruptHandler (
>      // Signal end of interrupt early to help avoid losing subsequent ticks from long duration handlers
>      gInterrupt->EndOfInterrupt (gInterrupt, Source);
>
> +    if (mTimerPeriod == 0) {
> +      DEBUG ((EFI_D_WARN, "%a: hack: this should never happen; dodged spurious"
> +        " interrupt 0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT64)Source));
> +      goto Done;
> +    }
> +
>      if (mTimerNotifyFunction) {
>        mTimerNotifyFunction (mTimerPeriod * mElapsedPeriod);
>      }
> @@ -340,6 +346,7 @@ TimerInterruptHandler (
>      ArmGenericTimerEnableTimer ();
>    }
>
> +Done:
>    // Enable timer interrupts
>    gInterrupt->EnableInterruptSource (gInterrupt, Source);
>
> --
> 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b
>


  reply	other threads:[~2018-03-06 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-06 13:24 [PATCH] ArmPkg/TimerDxe: Always perform an EOI, even for spurious interrupts Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 14:25 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-03-06 14:39   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 14:48   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70195198-34e4-5711-8534-abccad6068dd@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox