public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: "Wu, Jiaxin" <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>,
	"Fu, Siyuan" <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	"Ye, Ting" <ting.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check.
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 02:17:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70bb0ff8-09fe-42c9-0152-ffed039033bd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8jxoRWg2a_xXxzAqToVR_+YGAx8TnF8hqjbXC21EtR1w@mail.gmail.com>

On 01/18/19 12:09, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 at 06:38, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> This is my idea to avoid the duplicated mail. I also include Ard and Laszlo to collect the feedback on how to handle the partial update in the patchset.
>>
> 
> Laszlo may disagree with me, but I think that it is not always
> necessary to resend the entire series when only a single patch
> changes. It does depend on the situation, though: if it is a trivial
> patch in a more complicated series then it might make little sense. In
> other case, just resending the whole thing is probably better.

I think resending one patch can be acceptable, but the subject line
(patch nr) and the threading have to be correct. Also, I don't think
this approach scales beyond exactly one patch-update; it's easy to lose
track of version numbers etc. So "use sparingly" I guess? :)

Thanks
Laszlo

> 
> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Wu, Jiaxin
>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:32 PM
>>> To: Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check.
>>>
>>> Just confirmed with Liming, we don't need to seed the full series patches if only one is updated.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> jiaxin
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Fu, Siyuan
>>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:29 PM
>>>> To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>;
>>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>> Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
>>>> unnecessary NULL pointer check.
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Jiaxin
>>>>
>>>> Yes the full patch series is needed for a v2 version.
>>>>
>>>> And also, why you removed the "(Instance->Token != NULL)" check in the if
>>>> condition?
>>>>
>>>> BestRegards
>>>> Fu Siyuan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Wu, Hao A
>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:22 PM
>>>>> To: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>>> Cc: Ye, Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>; Fu, Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Gao,
>>>>> Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>>>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
>>>> unnecessary NULL
>>>>> pointer check.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jiaxin,
>>>>>
>>>>> A comment that is not related with the content of the patch itself:
>>>>> Please help to send the full patch series when a new version is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Hao Wu
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Wu, Jiaxin
>>>>>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 1:16 PM
>>>>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>>>> Cc: Ye, Ting; Fu, Siyuan; Wu, Hao A; Gao, Liming; Wu, Jiaxin
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove
>>>> unnecessary
>>>>>> NULL pointer check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2: The DHCP Instance might be destroyed in PxeDhcpDone. So,
>>>>>> we need safe-delete.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1469
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since the value of Instance is retrieved from the list Entry,
>>>>>> it can't be the NULL pointer, so just remove the unnecessary
>>>>>> check.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Ye Ting <ting.ye@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Fu Siyuan <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Wu Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Gao Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>>>>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wu Jiaxin <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>  MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c | 11 ++++-----
>>>> --
>>>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
>>>>>> b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
>>>>>> index 98a22a77b4..780f8b4224 100644
>>>>>> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
>>>>>> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/Network/Dhcp4Dxe/Dhcp4Io.c
>>>>>> @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
>>>>>>  /** @file
>>>>>>    EFI DHCP protocol implementation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Copyright (c) 2006 - 2018, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>>>>>> +Copyright (c) 2006 - 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
>>>>>>  This program and the accompanying materials
>>>>>>  are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the
>>>> BSD
>>>>>> License
>>>>>>  which accompanies this distribution.  The full text of the license may be
>>>>>> found at
>>>>>>  http://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @@ -1646,16 +1646,13 @@ ON_EXIT:
>>>>>>    //
>>>>>>    // Iterate through all the DhcpSb Children.
>>>>>>    //
>>>>>>    NET_LIST_FOR_EACH_SAFE (Entry, Next, &DhcpSb->Children) {
>>>>>>      Instance = NET_LIST_USER_STRUCT (Entry, DHCP_PROTOCOL, Link);
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> -    if ((Instance != NULL) && (Instance->Token != NULL)) {
>>>>>> -      Instance->Timeout--;
>>>>>> -      if (Instance->Timeout == 0) {
>>>>>> -        PxeDhcpDone (Instance);
>>>>>> -      }
>>>>>> +    Instance->Timeout--;
>>>>>> +    if (Instance->Timeout == 0) {
>>>>>> +      PxeDhcpDone (Instance);
>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>    }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    return ;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.17.1.windows.2
>>



  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-19  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-18  5:16 [PATCH v2 1/3] MdeModulePkg/Dhcp4Dxe: Remove unnecessary NULL pointer check Jiaxin Wu
2019-01-18  5:22 ` Wu, Hao A
2019-01-18  5:29   ` Fu, Siyuan
2019-01-18  5:31     ` Wu, Jiaxin
2019-01-18  5:38       ` Gao, Liming
2019-01-18 11:09         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-01-19  1:17           ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-01-20 18:25             ` Wu, Jiaxin
2019-01-21 12:53             ` Gao, Liming
2019-01-21 13:26               ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-01-21 21:21                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-01-21 22:47                   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70bb0ff8-09fe-42c9-0152-ffed039033bd@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox