From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from msmail.insydesw.com.tw (ms.insydesw.com [211.75.113.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A3B1A1EEE for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msmail.insydesw.com.tw ([fe80::74f7:f173:f4aa:9a05]) by msmail.insydesw.com.tw ([fe80::74f7:f173:f4aa:9a05%11]) with mapi id 14.01.0438.000; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:03:03 +0800 From: Tim Lewis To: "Gao, Liming" , Boaz Kahana , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: Protocol EFI_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION_PROTOCOL - included in UDK code but not part of the spec Thread-Index: AdIPsLF3tuc7Fe+1RouBAK+2myvhewECxgMQABlxMDA= Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:03:02 +0000 Message-ID: <7236196A5DF6C040855A6D96F556A53F3EEF30@msmail.insydesw.com.tw> References: <60b0bbecb9a64ffc9dfb1f1947c9b75f@SCL-EXCHMB-13.phoenix.com> <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14B47B0B2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14B47B0B2@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-TW X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [73.48.186.173] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Protocol EFI_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION_PROTOCOL - included in UDK code but not part of the spec X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 16:03:10 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Liming -- Could you change the protocol name, and then use a typedef with the old nam= e for compatibility? Tim -----Original Message----- From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Gao,= Liming Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 8:57 PM To: Boaz Kahana ; edk2-devel@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [edk2] Protocol EFI_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION_PROTOCOL - included= in UDK code but not part of the spec Boaz: This protocol is edk2 implement protocol. We have no plan to propose it t= o UEFI spec. Its EFI_ prefix is history reason. To avoid the incompatible c= hange, we don't change its definition. But for any new introduced protocol,= we will insist on this rule without EFI_ prefix.=20 Thanks Liming > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Boaz Kahana > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 8:25 AM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] Protocol EFI_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION_PROTOCOL -=20 > included in UDK code but not part of the spec >=20 > The protocol EFI_FORM_BROWSER_EXTENSION_PROTOCOL is defined in=20 > MdeModulePkg\Include\Protocol\FormBrowserEx.h with EFI_ prefix=20 > although it is not part of the UEFI spec. > (It was added by Intel - Liming - in Sep 2011) >=20 > IMHO it should be added to the UEFI spec otherwise it should not use=20 > the EFI_ prefix. >=20 > Boaz >=20 > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel