public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Cc: "Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>, "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] MdePkg/Pci22.h: Deprecate out-of-Spec IncompatiblePciDevice macros
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:10:38 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5B89B1BC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d5ee574-1d0a-fb68-0564-3910f024c6a0@redhat.com>

The reason actually is simple: I remembered to change the commit message
but forgot to change the code. I am using a Windows GUI tool (TortoiseGit) to
change the patch.

I just re-sent the correct patch. Please help to review it.

Thanks/Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 6:45 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
> Cc: Fan, Jeff <jeff.fan@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v4 6/6] MdePkg/Pci22.h: Deprecate out-of-Spec
> IncompatiblePciDevice macros
> 
> On 02/08/17 10:42, Ruiyu Ni wrote:
> > DEVICE_ID_NOCARE is defined as 0xFFFF but Spec says (UINT64) -1 should
> > be used to match any VendorId/DeviceId/RevisionId/
> > SubsystemVendorId/SubsystemDeviceId.
> >
> > PCI_BAR_OLD_ALIGN/PCI_BAR_EVEN_ALIGN/PCI_BAR_SQUAD_ALIGN/
> > PCI_BAR_DQUAD_ALIGN are defined but Spec doesn't have such
> > definitions.
> >
> > PCI_BAR_ALL is defined as 0xFF but Spec says (UINT64)-1 should be used
> > to match all BARs.
> >
> > PCI_ACPI_UNUSED and PCI_BAR_NOCHANGE are defined as 0 which
> compliant
> > with Spec but the name is too general and causes confusing.
> > IncompatiblePciDeviceSupport could directly use 0.
> >
> > All of the above macros are marked as deprecated.
> 
> I agree with the commit message update (thanks for that!), but
> PCI_ACPI_UNUSED and PCI_BAR_NOCHANGE aren't actually moved into the
> (!DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES) section, apparently.
> 
> Did you perhaps forget "git add" before "git commit --amend"? That would
> explain why the commit message was updated, but the patch wasn't.
> 
> Thanks
> Laszlo
> 
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++-----
> --
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h
> > b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h
> > index 4cf8389..5dec65d 100644
> > --- a/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h
> > +++ b/MdePkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Pci22.h
> > @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> >      PC Card Standard, 8.0
> >      PCI Power Management Interface Specifiction, Revision 1.2
> >
> > -  Copyright (c) 2006 - 2016, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > reserved.<BR>
> > +  Copyright (c) 2006 - 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights
> > + reserved.<BR>
> >    Copyright (c) 2014 - 2015, Hewlett-Packard Development Company,
> L.P.<BR>
> >    This program and the accompanying materials
> >    are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions of the
> BSD License
> > @@ -780,14 +780,25 @@ typedef struct {
> >    ///
> >  } EFI_PCI_CAPABILITY_HOTPLUG;
> >
> > -#define DEVICE_ID_NOCARE    0xFFFF
> > +///
> > +/// Below macros (till PCI_BAR_NOCHANGE) were used by
> EfiIncompatiblePciDeviceSupport Protocol.
> > +///
> > +#ifndef DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES
> > +
> > +///
> > +/// [ATTENTION] These macros are deprecated because they don't match
> Spec or not defined in Spec.
> > +///
> > +#define DEVICE_ID_NOCARE    0xFFFF                 ///< Deprecated. Value
> doesn't match Spec.
> > +#define PCI_BAR_OLD_ALIGN   0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL  ///< Deprecated.
> Value isn't defined in Spec.
> > +#define PCI_BAR_EVEN_ALIGN  0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEULL  ///<
> Deprecated. Value isn't defined in Spec.
> > +#define PCI_BAR_SQUAD_ALIGN 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFDULL  ///<
> Deprecated. Value isn't defined in Spec.
> > +#define PCI_BAR_DQUAD_ALIGN 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFCULL  ///<
> Deprecated. Value isn't defined in Spec.
> > +#define PCI_BAR_ALL         0xFF                   ///< Deprecated. Value doesn't
> match Spec.
> > +
> > +#endif
> >
> >  #define PCI_ACPI_UNUSED     0
> >  #define PCI_BAR_NOCHANGE    0
> > -#define PCI_BAR_OLD_ALIGN   0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFULL
> > -#define PCI_BAR_EVEN_ALIGN  0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFEULL -#define
> > PCI_BAR_SQUAD_ALIGN 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFDULL -#define
> PCI_BAR_DQUAD_ALIGN
> > 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFCULL
> >
> >  #define PCI_BAR_IDX0        0x00
> >  #define PCI_BAR_IDX1        0x01
> > @@ -795,7 +806,6 @@ typedef struct {
> >  #define PCI_BAR_IDX3        0x03
> >  #define PCI_BAR_IDX4        0x04
> >  #define PCI_BAR_IDX5        0x05
> > -#define PCI_BAR_ALL         0xFF
> >
> >  ///
> >  /// EFI PCI Option ROM definitions
> >



  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-09  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-08  9:42 [PATCH v4 0/6] Fix PciBus to accept Spec values as BarIndex and Alignment Ruiyu Ni
2017-02-08  9:42 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] MdePkg/Pci22.h: Deprecate out-of-Spec IncompatiblePciDevice macros Ruiyu Ni
2017-02-08 10:44   ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-09  2:10     ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
2017-02-09  2:06   ` Ruiyu Ni
2017-02-09 19:47     ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-02-10  3:13     ` Gao, Liming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5B89B1BC@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox