From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until booting it
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 06:18:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BA6E7B8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0C09AFA07DD0434D9E2A0C6AEB0483103B97C285@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
I didn't change the position of code to cache "BootNext", because:
This could avoid the "BootNext" (set by PlatformBootManagerLib) be consumed in *this* boot.
Maybe this time it's more clear.
Thanks/Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:13 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until
> booting it
>
> The commit log is saying the "BootNext" *DELETED* (before
> PlatformBootManagerLib) may be *LOST* if there is reset during
> PlatformBootManagerLib. I realized it.
>
> The comment is saying to avoid the "BootNext" "SET" by
> PlatformBootManagerLib. Sorry I am not getting the point.
>
> Thanks,
> Star
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ruiyu
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:02 PM
> To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until
> booting it
>
> This could avoid the "BootNext" set by PlatformBootManagerLib be consumed
> in *this* boot.
>
> If I add "*" around "this", is it more clear?
>
> Thanks/Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zeng, Star
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 2:00 PM
> > To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext"
> > until booting it
> >
> > I am ok with the code logic change, but a little confused by the new
> > comment. It seems not match with the commit log.
> >
> > " This could avoid the "BootNext" set by PlatformBootManagerLib be
> > consumed in this boot. "
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Star
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ni, Ruiyu
> > Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2017 1:50 PM
> > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until
> > booting it
> >
> > Current implementation deletes the "BootNext" before calling any
> > PlatformBootManagerLib APIs, but if system resets in
> > PlatformBootManagerLib APIs, "BootNext" is not consumed but lost.
> >
> > The patch defers the deletion of "BootNext" to before booting it.
> >
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsEntry.c | 35
> > ++++++++++++++++++--------
> > ------
> > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsEntry.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsEntry.c
> > index ac5f9088dd..a6fe617b56 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsEntry.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsEntry.c
> > @@ -808,7 +808,8 @@ BdsEntry (
> > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> >
> > //
> > - // Cache and remove the "BootNext" NV variable.
> > + // Cache the "BootNext" NV variable before calling any
> > + PlatformBootManagerLib APIs // This could avoid the "BootNext" set
> > + by
> > PlatformBootManagerLib be consumed in this boot.
> > //
> > GetEfiGlobalVariable2 (EFI_BOOT_NEXT_VARIABLE_NAME, (VOID **)
> > &BootNext, &DataSize);
> > if (DataSize != sizeof (UINT16)) {
> > @@ -817,17 +818,6 @@ BdsEntry (
> > }
> > BootNext = NULL;
> > }
> > - Status = gRT->SetVariable (
> > - EFI_BOOT_NEXT_VARIABLE_NAME,
> > - &gEfiGlobalVariableGuid,
> > - 0,
> > - 0,
> > - NULL
> > - );
> > - //
> > - // Deleting NV variable shouldn't fail unless it doesn't exist.
> > - //
> > - ASSERT (Status == EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_NOT_FOUND);
> >
> > //
> > // Initialize the platform language variables @@ -1052,10 +1042,25
> > @@ BdsEntry (
> >
> > EfiBootManagerHotkeyBoot ();
> >
> > - //
> > - // Boot to "BootNext"
> > - //
> > if (BootNext != NULL) {
> > + //
> > + // Delete "BootNext" NV variable before transferring control to
> > + it to
> > prevent loops.
> > + //
> > + Status = gRT->SetVariable (
> > + EFI_BOOT_NEXT_VARIABLE_NAME,
> > + &gEfiGlobalVariableGuid,
> > + 0,
> > + 0,
> > + NULL
> > + );
> > + //
> > + // Deleting NV variable shouldn't fail unless it doesn't exist.
> > + //
> > + ASSERT (Status == EFI_SUCCESS || Status == EFI_NOT_FOUND);
> > +
> > + //
> > + // Boot to "BootNext"
> > + //
> > UnicodeSPrint (BootNextVariableName, sizeof
> > (BootNextVariableName), L"Boot%04x", *BootNext);
> > Status = EfiBootManagerVariableToLoadOption
> > (BootNextVariableName, &LoadOption);
> > if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> > --
> > 2.12.2.windows.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-28 6:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 5:50 [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/BdsDxe: Don't delete "BootNext" until booting it Ruiyu Ni
2017-09-28 5:59 ` Zeng, Star
2017-09-28 6:01 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-09-28 6:13 ` Zeng, Star
2017-09-28 6:18 ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
2017-09-28 6:22 ` Zeng, Star
2017-09-28 6:46 ` Wang, Sunny (HPS SW)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BA6E7B8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox