From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.93; helo=mga11.intel.com; envelope-from=ruiyu.ni@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA214202E6182 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 01:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Nov 2017 01:23:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,337,1505804400"; d="scan'208";a="145502527" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2017 01:23:28 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 01:23:07 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by fmsmsx111.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 01:23:06 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.152]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.175]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 16:22:57 +0800 From: "Ni, Ruiyu" To: "Wang, Jian J" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" CC: "Carsey, Jaben" , "Bi, Dandan" Thread-Topic: [PATCH 2/3] ShellPkg: Fix misuses of AllocateCopyPool Thread-Index: AQHTVGBY/k4Ifk3HFkmxO/4jnsz+XaMCTnzA Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 08:22:57 +0000 Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BAB201A@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20171103045759.26508-1-jian.j.wang@intel.com> <20171103045759.26508-3-jian.j.wang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20171103045759.26508-3-jian.j.wang@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYzQ5NDM1YWYtNTQyMi00YTgzLWFlOWYtMGU2MWQzM2Q5MDFmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjIuNS4xOCIsIlRydXN0ZWRMYWJlbEhhc2giOiJuOUhTYUZxWkc0aW04SlVFc2dQRFFmZitvalVVbmhuOU52RVVQZThLK0VZMzVqaUoxaGlFUXoyQW1CRzRXb1JyIn0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ShellPkg: Fix misuses of AllocateCopyPool X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 08:19:35 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2 comments below. -----Original Message----- From: Wang, Jian J=20 Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 12:58 PM To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org Cc: Carsey, Jaben ; Ni, Ruiyu ;= Bi, Dandan Subject: [PATCH 2/3] ShellPkg: Fix misuses of AllocateCopyPool AllocateCopyPool(AllocationSize, *Buffer) will copy "AllocationSize" bytes = of memory from old "Buffer" to new allocated one. If "AllocationSize" is bigge= r than size of "Buffer", heap memory overflow occurs during copy. The solution is to allocate pool first then copy the necessary bytes to new memory. This can avoid copying extra bytes from unknown memory range. Cc: Jaben Carsey Cc: Ruiyu Ni Cc: Bi Dandan Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang --- ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c | 4 +++= - ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib.c | 6 +++= +-- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c b/ShellPkg/Application/Shel= l/Shell.c index 5471930ba1..24a04ca323 100644 --- a/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c +++ b/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.c @@ -1646,7 +1646,9 @@ ShellConvertVariables ( // // now do the replacements... // - NewCommandLine1 =3D AllocateCopyPool(NewSize, OriginalCommandLine); + NewCommandLine1 =3D AllocatePool(NewSize); + ASSERT (NewCommandLine1 !=3D NULL); [Ray] 1. Please do not use assertion because there is NULL check in the bel= ow if-statement. The rule in ShellPkg is avoid using assertion. + CopyMem (NewCommandLine1, OriginalCommandLine, StrSize (OriginalCommandL= ine)); NewCommandLine2 =3D AllocateZeroPool(NewSize); ItemTemp =3D AllocateZeroPool(ItemSize+(2*sizeof(CHAR16))); if (NewCommandLine1 =3D=3D NULL || NewCommandLine2 =3D=3D NULL || ItemTe= mp =3D=3D NULL) { diff --git a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib/UefiShellBcfgCommandL= ib.c b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib.c index 1122c89b8b..5de62219b3 100644 --- a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib.c +++ b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib/UefiShellBcfgCommandLib.c @@ -143,10 +143,11 @@ UpdateOptionalData( OriginalOptionDataSize +=3D (*(UINT16*)(OriginalData + sizeof(UINT32))= ); OriginalOptionDataSize -=3D OriginalSize; NewSize =3D OriginalSize - OriginalOptionDataSize + DataSize; - NewData =3D AllocateCopyPool(NewSize, OriginalData); + NewData =3D AllocatePool(NewSize); if (NewData =3D=3D NULL) { Status =3D EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; } else { + CopyMem (NewData, OriginalData, OriginalSize - OriginalOptionDataSiz= e); CopyMem(NewData + OriginalSize - OriginalOptionDataSize, Data, DataS= ize); } } @@ -1120,11 +1121,12 @@ BcfgAddOpt( // Now we know how many EFI_INPUT_KEY structs we need to attach to= the end of the EFI_KEY_OPTION struct. =20 // Re-allocate with the added information. // - KeyOptionBuffer =3D AllocateCopyPool(sizeof(EFI_KEY_OPTION) + (siz= eof(EFI_INPUT_KEY) * NewKeyOption.KeyData.Options.InputKeyCount), &NewKeyOp= tion); + KeyOptionBuffer =3D AllocatePool (sizeof(EFI_KEY_OPTION) + (sizeof= (EFI_INPUT_KEY) * NewKeyOption.KeyData.Options.InputKeyCount)); if (KeyOptionBuffer =3D=3D NULL) { ShellPrintHiiEx(-1, -1, NULL, STRING_TOKEN (STR_GEN_NO_MEM), gSh= ellBcfgHiiHandle, L"bcfg"); =20 ShellStatus =3D SHELL_OUT_OF_RESOURCES; } [Ray] 2. Should the above NULL check return? + CopyMem (KeyOptionBuffer, &NewKeyOption, sizeof(EFI_KEY_OPTION)); } for (LoopCounter =3D 0 ; ShellStatus =3D=3D SHELL_SUCCESS && LoopCou= nter < NewKeyOption.KeyData.Options.InputKeyCount; LoopCounter++) { // --=20 2.14.1.windows.1