From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Permerror (SPF Permanent Error: More than 10 MX records returned) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.115; helo=mga14.intel.com; envelope-from=ruiyu.ni@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DAF32214E324 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:52:10 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2017 22:56:47 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,391,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="1788292" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2017 22:56:46 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:56:44 -0800 Received: from shsmsx152.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.52) by FMSMSX125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 22:56:44 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.152]) by SHSMSX152.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.6.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:56:43 +0800 From: "Ni, Ruiyu" To: "Zeng, Star" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" CC: "Yao, Jiewen" , "Gao, Liming" , "Kinney, Michael D" Thread-Topic: [PATCH 0/3] Correct function description for ALLOCATE_BUFFER Thread-Index: AQHTckzNepeDGnEkD0ijx59ncrdb3aM9tWUA Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:56:42 +0000 Deferred-Delivery: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:56:00 +0000 Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BAF82E0@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1512975222-8048-1-git-send-email-star.zeng@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1512975222-8048-1-git-send-email-star.zeng@intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Correct function description for ALLOCATE_BUFFER X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 06:52:10 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reviewed-by: Ruiyu Ni Thanks/Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Zeng, Star > Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 2:54 PM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Cc: Zeng, Star ; Yao, Jiewen ; > Ni, Ruiyu ; Gao, Liming ; Kinne= y, > Michael D > Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Correct function description for ALLOCATE_BUFFER >=20 > According to UEFI spec, DUAL_ADDRESS_CYCLE is missing in the > EFI_UNSUPPORTED return status description for ALLOCATE_BUFFER > interface. > Same issue is also in IOMMU interface. >=20 > Cc: Jiewen Yao > Cc: Ruiyu Ni > Cc: Liming Gao > Cc: Michael D Kinney >=20 > Star Zeng (3): > MdePkg PciIo.h: Correct function description for ALLOCATE_BUFFER > MdeModulePkg: Correct function description for AllocateBuffer > IntelSilicon: Correct function description for AllocateBuffer >=20 > IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/BmDma.c | 2 +- > IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdDxe/IntelVTdDxe.c | 2 +- > IntelSiliconPkg/Feature/VTd/IntelVTdPmrPei/IntelVTdPmrPei.c | 2 +- > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.c | 4 ++-- > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.h | 4 ++-- > MdeModulePkg/Include/Ppi/IoMmu.h | 2 +- > MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/IoMmu.h | 2 +- > MdePkg/Include/Protocol/PciIo.h | 4 ++-- > 8 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 2.7.0.windows.1