From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 09:07:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BB690C2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu_hMH_BLkTfvHPFPUjv-oQsDEccTO4iZ1Gv-AqaKHQc=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Ard,
No more comments from my side.
Thanks/Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 4:26 PM
> To: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Ni,
> Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers
>
> On 29 January 2018 at 05:13, Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com> wrote:
> > One minor comment, please help to remove the line (around line 1067):
> > @param[in] Capability The capability of the slot.
> >
> > within function description comment for SdMmcHcInitHost() in file:
> > MdeModulePkg\Bus\Pci\SdMmcPciHcDxe\SdMmcPciHci.c
> >
> > Other than that, the series is good to me:
> > Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> >
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> > Really sorry for the delay.
> >
>
> No worries. Star, Ray, any more comments from your side?
>
>
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
> >> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 6:43 AM
> >> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >> Cc: leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Kinney, Michael D; Zeng, Star; Tian,
> >> Feng; Ni, Ruiyu; Wu, Hao A; Ard Biesheuvel
> >> Subject: [PATCH v4 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers
> >>
> >> Many SDHCI implementations exist that are almost spec complicant, and
> >> could be driven by the generic SD/MMC host controller driver except
> >> for some minimal necessary init time tweaks.
> >>
> >> Adding such tweaks to the generic driver is undesirable. On the other
> >> hand, forking the driver for every platform that has such a SDHCI
> >> controller is problematic when it comes to upstreaming and ongoing
> >> maintenance (which is arguably the point of upstreaming in the first
> >> place).
> >>
> >> So these patches propose a workaround that is minimally invasive on
> >> the
> >> EDK2 side, but gives platforms a lot of leeway when it comes to
> >> applying SDHCI quirks.
> >>
> >> Changes since v3:
> >> - remove PassThru argument from protocol members: it is unclear whether
> the
> >> protocol is available when the override protocol is invoked, and my
> >> example use case does not need it
> >> - replace incorrect HandleProtocol with LocateProtocol, given that the
> override
> >> protocol is now a singleton instance
> >> - merge notifier calls into SdMmcHcReset() and SdMmcHcInitHost (), this
> >> required changing the prototype to take a SD_MMC_HC_PRIVATE_DATA*
> >> argument
> >> and so the prototypes no longer belong in SdMmcPciHci.h and have
> >> been moved
> >> to SdMmcPciHcDxe.h
> >> - use VOID* type for capability not UINT64* since we don't know its
> >> alignment
> >>
> >> Changes since v2:
> >> - use a singleton instance of the SD/MMC protocol rather than one per
> >> controller; this is needed to support 'reconnect -r', as pointed out
> >> by Ray
> >> - use EDKII prefixes for all types defined by the protocol
> >> - replace 'hook' with 'notify', and tweak some other identifiers
> >> - add missing function comment headers for factored out functions
> >>
> >> Changes since RFC/v1:
> >> - add EFI_SD_MMC_PASS_THRU_PROTOCOL* member to override methods
> >> - use UINT64* not VOID* to pass capability structure (which is always 64 bits
> >> in size)
> >>
> >> Ard Biesheuvel (2):
> >> MdeModulePkg: introduce SD/MMC override protocol
> >> MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: allow HC capabilities to be overridden
> >>
> >> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.c | 35 ++++++-
> >> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.h | 36
> ++++++++
> >> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHcDxe.inf | 2 +
> >> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.c | 95
> >> +++++++++++++++++--
> >> MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/SdMmcPciHcDxe/SdMmcPciHci.h | 35 -------
> >> MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h | 97
> >> ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.dec | 3 +
> >> 7 files changed, 257 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) create mode
> >> 100644 MdeModulePkg/Include/Protocol/SdMmcOverride.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.11.0
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-30 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-07 22:43 [PATCH v4 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-07 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] MdeModulePkg: introduce SD/MMC override protocol Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-07 22:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] MdeModulePkg/SdMmcPciHcDxe: allow HC capabilities to be overridden Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-12 7:00 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] quirks handling for SDHCI controllers Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-12 10:56 ` Wu, Hao A
2017-12-12 10:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-08 19:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-29 5:13 ` Wu, Hao A
2018-01-29 8:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-01-30 1:24 ` Zeng, Star
2018-01-30 9:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 5:14 ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2018-03-06 11:10 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-03-06 11:18 ` Meenakshi Aggarwal
2018-01-30 9:07 ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BB690C2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox