public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
To: "afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>
Cc: edk2-devel <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	Fan Jeff <vanjeff_919@hotmail.com>,
	 "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Is the PEI Core MP Safe? UefiCpuPkg seems to think so calling GetFirstGuidHob on the APs?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:34:51 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BD3F788@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1800C800-ED89-4C23-89CB-E8E5E1CCE672@apple.com>

Andrew,
Today's MpInitLib does depend on physical memory (the waking up vector sits below 1MB).
So the MpPei module can use RegisterForShadow() to make sure it is loaded in memory before running.
Then the module global variable can be used.
But when system is in S3 boot path, it seems PeiCore doesn't follow RegisterForShadow() to load the PEIM
in memory.

Using IDT entry as the storage of global variable is a good idea. We will evaluate.

Thanks/Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: afish@apple.com <afish@apple.com>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 11:25 AM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] Is the PEI Core MP Safe? UefiCpuPkg seems to think so
> calling GetFirstGuidHob on the APs?
> 
> 
> 
> > On Jun 20, 2018, at 8:06 PM, Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew,
> > Good catch! It does break the rule that AP shouldn't call PEI services.
> > But considering the specific case, it should be safe.
> > Because:
> > 1. HOB only stores a pointer to the buffer that contains all the MP
> information.
> > 2. BSP modifies the HOB by only appending data to the end. It may
> > modifies some HOB content. But MpInitLib implementation itself doesn't
> modify the pointer value stored in HOB.
> >
> 
> Ray,
> 
> I think the should be safe is also making assumptions about the debug and a
> few other library instances that got tested against. It is not really an
> architectural guaranty against the library classes that could be linked. We
> don't use the default
> 
> It would be good to use an IDT entry, or optionally a global variable if memory
> is present, longer term.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andrew Fish
> 
> > In PEI environment where global variable is read-only, it's hard to not rely
> on HOB.
> > I guess that's the reason of today's tricky implementation.
> >
> > Thanks/Ray
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: edk2-devel <edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org> On Behalf Of
> >> Andrew Fish
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 1:23 AM
> >> To: edk2-devel <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> >> Subject: [edk2] Is the PEI Core MP Safe? UefiCpuPkg seems to think so
> >> calling GetFirstGuidHob on the APs?
> >>
> >> Is there some MP safe contract with the PEI Core implementation I
> >> don't know about?
> >>
> >> Looks like the APs are calling PeiServicesGetHobList() to figure out
> >> "who they are"? How does this work? Or am I missing something?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpIn
> >> i
> >> tLib/MpLib.c#L1945
> >>
> >> /**
> >>  This return the handle number for the calling processor.  This
> >> service may be  called from the BSP and APs.
> >>  @param[out] ProcessorNumber  Pointer to the handle number of AP.
> >>                               The range is from 0 to the total number of
> >>                               logical processors minus 1. The total number of
> >>                               logical processors can be retrieved by
> >>                               MpInitLibGetNumberOfProcessors().
> >>  @retval EFI_SUCCESS             The current processor handle number was
> >> returned
> >>                                  in ProcessorNumber.
> >>  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   ProcessorNumber is NULL.
> >>  @retval EFI_NOT_READY           MP Initialize Library is not initialized.
> >> **/
> >> EFI_STATUS
> >> EFIAPI
> >> MpInitLibWhoAmI (
> >>  OUT UINTN                    *ProcessorNumber
> >>  )
> >> {
> >>  CPU_MP_DATA           *CpuMpData;
> >>
> >>  if (ProcessorNumber == NULL) {
> >>    return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  CpuMpData = GetCpuMpData ();
> >>
> >>  return GetProcessorNumber (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber); }
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpIn
> >> i
> >> tLib/PeiMpLib.c#L34
> >>
> >> /**
> >>  Get pointer to CPU MP Data structure.
> >>  @return  The pointer to CPU MP Data structure.
> >> **/
> >> CPU_MP_DATA *
> >> GetCpuMpData (
> >>  VOID
> >>  )
> >> {
> >>  CPU_MP_DATA      *CpuMpData;
> >>
> >>  CpuMpData = GetCpuMpDataFromGuidedHob ();  ASSERT
> (CpuMpData !=
> >> NULL);  return CpuMpData; }
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpIn
> >> i
> >> tLib/MpLib.c#L2302
> >>
> >>
> >> /**
> >>  Get pointer to CPU MP Data structure from GUIDed HOB.
> >>  @return  The pointer to CPU MP Data structure.
> >> **/
> >> CPU_MP_DATA *
> >> GetCpuMpDataFromGuidedHob (
> >>  VOID
> >>  )
> >> {
> >>  EFI_HOB_GUID_TYPE       *GuidHob;
> >>  VOID                    *DataInHob;
> >>  CPU_MP_DATA             *CpuMpData;
> >>
> >>  CpuMpData = NULL;
> >>  GuidHob = GetFirstGuidHob (&mCpuInitMpLibHobGuid);  if (GuidHob !=
> >> NULL) {
> >>    DataInHob = GET_GUID_HOB_DATA (GuidHob);
> >>    CpuMpData = (CPU_MP_DATA *) (*(UINTN *) DataInHob);  }  return
> >> CpuMpData; }
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Andrew Fish
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> edk2-devel mailing list
> >> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
> > _______________________________________________
> > edk2-devel mailing list
> > edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel



  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-20 17:23 Is the PEI Core MP Safe? UefiCpuPkg seems to think so calling GetFirstGuidHob on the APs? Andrew Fish
2018-06-21  3:06 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-06-21  3:24   ` Andrew Fish
2018-06-21  3:34     ` Ni, Ruiyu [this message]
2018-06-21  5:57       ` Dong, Eric
2018-06-22  6:52     ` 答复: " Fan Jeff
2018-06-22 17:32       ` Andrew Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5BD3F788@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox