Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] Removed unused PCDs

["Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 6:14 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>; Zhang, Chao B <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org;
> Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH v3 00/16] Removed unused PCDs
> 
> Ray, Chao,
> 
> guys, you keep breaking the development process. Please fix your email
> clients *now*.
> 
> This is not the first time it has happened. If I remember correctly, Ray blamed
> his email client last time (not showing message threads correctly, or
> something similar).
> 
> I'm sorry, but this is unacceptable. This is on-going, systemic disregard for the
> project's other participants.
> 
> Please fix your mail user agents *now*.
> 
> Here's my promise. Next time, I'm going to revert such commits (assuming I
> manage to catch them again). They do not represent the facts from the
> mailing list.

Sorry about that. I can understand it.
So this is the first mail I choose to reply after a long holiday.
I am now using Mozilla Thunderbird to only receive mails from this mailing list.
This mail client can group the mails correctly so if I missed any R-b that's absolutely
my fault😊

There is a difference between help-to-push for Intel developers and non-Intel developers.
As the Intel developer, Shenglei is very kind to prepare the patch files with R-b and
send to me internally as attachments. All I need to do is pushing the patches.
Before the pushing, I will check whether there is R-b but won't check whether all R-bs
are there.

For non-Intel developers, I will edit the patch to list all R-bs before pushing.

Again, thanks for enforcing the process. We will follow the process more strictly in future.

> 
> Laszlo