From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Nikodem, Damian" <damian.nikodem@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"You, Benjamin" <benjamin.you@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Rusocki, Krzysztof" <krzysztof.rusocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] UefiCpuPkg: Fix potential spinLock issue in SmmStartupThisAp
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:37:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C2D164D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190911082301.1488-1-damian.nikodem@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikodem, Damian
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2019 1:23 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Nikodem, Damian <damian.nikodem@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; You,
> Benjamin <benjamin.you@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Rusocki, Krzysztof <krzysztof.rusocki@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3] UefiCpuPkg: Fix potential spinLock issue in SmmStartupThisAp
>
> Due to needs a tackling the deficiency of the AP API, is necessary to ensure that in non-blocking mode
> previous AP executed command is finished before start new one.
>
> To remedy above:
> 1) execute AcquireSpinLock instead AcquireSpinLockOrFail - this will ensure time "window" to eliminate potential
> race condition beetwen BSP and AP spinLock release in non-blocking mode.
> This also will eliminate possibility to start executing new AP function before last is finished.
> 2) remove returns EFI_STATUS - EFI_NOT_READY - in new scenario returned status is not necessary to caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Damian Nikodem <damian.nikodem@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Benjamin You <benjamin.you@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Rusocki <krzysztof.rusocki@intel.com>
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> index d8d2b6f444..0685637c2b 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> @@ -1235,14 +1235,9 @@ InternalSmmStartupThisAp (
> return EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER;
> }
>
> - if (Token == NULL) {
> - AcquireSpinLock (mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Busy);
> - } else {
> - if (!AcquireSpinLockOrFail (mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Busy)) {
> - DEBUG((DEBUG_ERROR, "Can't acquire mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[%d].Busy\n", CpuIndex));
> - return EFI_NOT_READY;
> - }
> + AcquireSpinLock (mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Busy);
>
> + if (Token != NULL) {
> *Token = (MM_COMPLETION) CreateToken ();
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-11 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-11 8:23 [PATCH v3] UefiCpuPkg: Fix potential spinLock issue in SmmStartupThisAp Damian Nikodem
2019-09-11 14:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-09-11 17:37 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C2D164D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox