From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Chaganty, Rangasai V" <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>,
"Lou, Yun" <yun.lou@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 06:59:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C354F78@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191107133831.22412-3-jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Jiewen,
The structure field is named "Version" while the macro is ended with "_REVISION".
Is there a special reason for such inconsistency?
Thanks,
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 9:38 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH V3 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device
> Security Policy protocol
>
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> Cc: Yun Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> ---
> .../Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h | 128 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644
> Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
>
> diff --git
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolic
> y.h
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolic
> y.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..b151781de2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecur
> +++ ityPolicy.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
> +/** @file
> + Platform Device Security Policy Protocol definition
> +
> + Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> + SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> +
> +**/
> +
> +
> +#ifndef __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> +#define __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> +
> +#include <Uefi.h>
> +#include <Protocol/DeviceSecurity.h>
> +
> +typedef struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> +EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL;
> +
> +//
> +// Revision The revision to which the DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY protocol
> interface adheres.
> +// All future revisions must be backwards compatible.
> +// If a future version is not back wards compatible it is not the same
> GUID.
> +//
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_REVISION
> 0x00010000
> +
> +//
> +// Revision The revision to which the DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY structure
> adheres.
> +// All future revisions must be backwards compatible.
> +//
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_REVISION 0x00010000
> +
> +///
> +/// The macro for the policy defined in EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY
> +///
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_MEASUREMENT_REQUIRED BIT0
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_AUTHENTICATION_REQUIRED BIT0
> +
> +///
> +/// The device security policy data structure /// typedef struct {
> + UINT32 Version;
> + UINT32 MeasurementPolicy;
> + UINT32 AuthenticationPolicy;
> +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY;
> +
> +//
> +// Revision The revision to which the DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE structure
> adheres.
> +// All future revisions must be backwards compatible.
> +//
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_REVISION 0x00010000
> +
> +///
> +/// The macro for the state defined in EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE ///
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_SUCCESS 0
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR BIT31
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_UNSUPPORTED
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x0)
> +#define
> EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_GET_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x1)
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_PCI_NO_CAPABILITIES
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x10)
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_TCG_EXTEND_TPM_PCR
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x20)
> +
> +///
> +/// The device security state data structure /// typedef struct {
> + UINT32 Version;
> + UINT32 MeasurementState;
> + UINT32 AuthenticationState;
> +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE;
> +
> +/**
> + This function returns the device security policy associated with the device.
> +
> + The device security driver may call this interface to get the
> + platform policy for the specific device and determine if the
> + measurement or authentication is required.
> +
> + @param[in] This The protocol instance pointer.
> + @param[in] DeviceId The Identifier for the device.
> + @param[out] DeviceSecurityPolicy The Device Security Policy associated
> with the device.
> +
> + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The device security policy is returned
> + @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED The function is unsupported for the
> specific Device.
> +**/
> +typedef
> +EFI_STATUS
> +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY) (
> + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL *This,
> + IN EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER *DeviceId,
> + OUT EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY *DeviceSecurityPolicy
> + );
> +
> +/**
> + This function sets the device state based upon the authentication result.
> +
> + The device security driver may call this interface to give the
> + platform a notify based upon the measurement or authentication result.
> + If the authentication or measurement fails, the platform may choose:
> + 1) Do nothing.
> + 2) Disable this device or slot temporarily and continue boot.
> + 3) Reset the platform and retry again.
> + 4) Disable this device or slot permanently.
> + 5) Any other platform specific action.
> +
> + @param[in] This The protocol instance pointer.
> + @param[in] DeviceId The Identifier for the device.
> + @param[in] DeviceSecurityState The Device Security state associated
> with the device.
> +
> + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The device state is set.
> + @retval EFI_UNSUPPORTED The function is unsupported for the
> specific Device.
> +**/
> +typedef
> +EFI_STATUS
> +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_NOTIFY_DEVICE_STATE) (
> + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL *This,
> + IN EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER *DeviceId,
> + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE *DeviceSecurityState
> + );
> +
> +struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL {
> + UINT32 Version;
> + EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY GetDevicePolicy;
> + EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_NOTIFY_DEVICE_STATE NotifyDeviceState;
> +};
> +
> +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiDeviceSecurityPolicyProtocolGuid;
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.19.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-08 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-07 13:38 [PATCH V3 0/6] Add Device Security driver Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-08 6:58 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-08 6:59 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2019-11-08 7:01 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-08 7:10 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-09 7:12 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-08 7:01 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityDxe: Add PciSecurity Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-11 8:19 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-11 10:16 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-11 14:40 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] IntelSiliconPkg/SamplePlatformDevicePolicyDxe: Add sample policy Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-11 8:23 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 13:38 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dsc: Add Device Security component Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-11 8:23 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-08 4:23 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V3 0/6] Add Device Security driver Javeed, Ashraf
2019-11-08 5:14 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-08 10:25 ` Javeed, Ashraf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C354F78@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox