From: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>
To: "Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Kubacki, Michael A" <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 06:36:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C428F6D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200206052356.3672-2-hao.a.wu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2020 1:24 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Laszlo Ersek
> <lersek@redhat.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA
>
> This reverts commit 88bd06616617ef2569f093f7b51893c11ad78e26.
>
> REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2465
>
> Commit 88bd0661661 relocates the 'MicrocodePatchAddress' and
> 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' fields in structure CPU_MP_DATA to ensure that
> they can be properly passed between different architectures.
>
> However, such change is not backward compatible with the scenario like
> pre-existing binaries such as FSP. These binaries are built when the code
> base has a different version of the CPU_MP_DATA structure definition. This
> may cause issues when accessing the 'MicrocodePatchAddress' and
> 'MicrocodePatchRegionSize' fields, since their offsets are different
> (between PEI phase in the FSP binaries and DXE phase in current code
> implementation).
>
> Cc: Michael Kubacki <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
> index 7c62d75acc..d7e20f0b74 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.h
> @@ -219,8 +219,6 @@ struct _CPU_MP_DATA {
> UINT64 CpuInfoInHob;
> UINT32 CpuCount;
> UINT32 BspNumber;
> - UINT64 MicrocodePatchAddress;
> - UINT64 MicrocodePatchRegionSize;
> //
> // The above fields data will be passed from PEI to DXE
> // Please make sure the fields offset same in the different
> @@ -264,6 +262,8 @@ struct _CPU_MP_DATA {
> UINT8 Vector;
> BOOLEAN PeriodicMode;
> BOOLEAN TimerInterruptState;
> + UINT64 MicrocodePatchAddress;
> + UINT64 MicrocodePatchRegionSize;
>
> //
> // Whether need to use Init-Sipi-Sipi to wake up the APs.
> --
> 2.12.0.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-10 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 5:23 [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix backward incompatible CPU_MP_DATA struct change Wu, Hao A
2020-02-06 5:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Relocate microcode patch fields in CPU_MP_DATA Wu, Hao A
2020-02-07 2:34 ` Dong, Eric
2020-02-10 6:36 ` Ni, Ray [this message]
2020-02-06 5:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Not pass microcode info between archs " Wu, Hao A
2020-02-07 2:34 ` [edk2-devel] " Dong, Eric
2020-02-11 2:31 ` Ni, Ray
2020-02-06 6:21 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] Fix backward incompatible CPU_MP_DATA struct change Wu, Hao A
2020-02-11 2:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Wu, Hao A
2020-02-11 5:06 ` Wu, Hao A
2020-02-06 13:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C428F6D@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox