From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1107E211AEA42 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:18:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8857CA7889; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-125-208.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.125.208]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B940A1048104; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:17:59 +0000 (UTC) To: stephano References: <4330857f-4e27-632f-6f82-6fc6ec636b2e@linux.intel.com> Cc: edk2-devel-01 , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Ard Biesheuvel , Leif Lindholm From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <740c5788-4e15-7fef-6674-af0ef8ee0181@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 21:17:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4330857f-4e27-632f-6f82-6fc6ec636b2e@linux.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.30]); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: about 'sr.ht' [was: Research Request] X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:18:06 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 11/14/18 19:34, stephano wrote: > We are currently researching several different options to help make > contributing to TianoCore easier for the community. A big part of this > effort will be enabling pull requests and allowing for a more > customizable code review process. > > I am looking for members of the community willing to answer a few > questions about these solutions to allow us to evaluate our options > quickly. The options are: > > System/Tool        Investigator > Phabricator        Rebecca Cran (thank you again :) ) > Github            ??? > Gerrit            ??? > Gitlab            ??? > > I have a list of questions that I can send out to each investigator. > Assuming you are familiar with the software/system, these questions > should be answerable with a couple hours of research, writing, and > screenshots / examples. I'm not making a real proposal for "sr.ht" at this time, just raising it as one collaboration software ("forge") that seems to get its goals exactly right (in my opinion anyway): https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/775963/e9849144cef5c99d/ https://drewdevault.com/2018/11/15/sr.ht-general-availability.html https://lwn.net/Articles/776296/ It is admittedly alpha at this point, hence likely unsuitable for production use. If it were a mature project, it would be extremely attractive to me. I hope I can keep an eye on it over time. Thanks, Laszlo