From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Received: from mail-pg0-x22b.google.com (mail-pg0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53D8F81E97
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 03:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id f188so68585096pgc.3
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Tue, 29 Nov 2016 03:38:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google;
 h=to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=N1mGwJ0W/XLArQbJSddep6hDuNXfB0sqrrZ9EiAPV+E=;
 b=ePvIoe7dRlGoxOaAQ6sznFcYpenATysVDhxmJizruY1JcfAaVBT539xxSVjSYRxXJi
 gTXyIxpQNVpyWcn7crU08Wxi6emBoZ6zo1g5fhx8GLs3LF7HKGhOoG4ofacZjZUjrdH/
 gzg+lP9PsUrYEeYyUZkyCYbcTI8QWUmQ3qsKo=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:to:cc:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=N1mGwJ0W/XLArQbJSddep6hDuNXfB0sqrrZ9EiAPV+E=;
 b=VYZJDZWal+hlhYvOlwEZaiqoVAlG69jQBOfCIm2Ge8d11QRhalttlLg4kzdcQKV2OI
 1EPaLLesW4eldYYpFU0SxZoyObRf7gBrn2kB4dDGIKgdKHIHt/YzmRE/LXMiAmRnt6VN
 uPQw5a77XDtbHo92b4OZM1NBSV5ohgP3qsZXDwP0PbUFOLmjEJqbTH5u+R/CPQqB2A5N
 Kns0R9MfXl7Oj9v1AUGVShM03Hv2+tHpQa1V9wulzlX3/7L0C4eklBdh06rSGzZ8A04u
 gGS4pm2DvvGSWbUHP0QFECsfBKMX0kTA1/LbzaqE3dkJ65HEgvkdf+FNvVvHecGLrdnt
 THUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00rPBnO1dobpZ/SZL1vM5/om3FipUUk73hybxyHgPdkRTE/Kgim/YxayTuisqnZVuh8
X-Received: by 10.99.202.72 with SMTP id o8mr48750671pgi.41.1480419515609;
 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 03:38:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.229.36.249] ([119.145.15.121])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm76695510pgn.17.2016.11.29.03.38.34
 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 29 Nov 2016 03:38:35 -0800 (PST)
To: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>, Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>,
 Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>, Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
From: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <7491c75b-6f55-3da0-8983-55a72cd7ab49@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 19:38:28 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Which revision of PXE spec does EDK2 code conform to?
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 11:38:36 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi folks,

Which revision of PXE spec does EDK2 code conform to? Is it PXE v2.1? Do 
PXE implementations in MdeModulePkg and NetworkPkg comform to the same 
revision?

Thanks and regards,

Heyi