public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: wang xiaofeng <winggundum82@163.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: CapsuleApp behavior for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 01:23:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F0170@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3ee8db59.55ad.15a35cab3c6.Coremail.winggundum82@163.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312", Size: 5205 bytes --]

Would you please help to file a bugzillar for tracking purpose?

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

From: wang xiaofeng [mailto:winggundum82@163.com]
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 8:46 PM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re:Re: [edk2] CapsuleApp behavior for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule

Hi Jiewen,
   Thanks ! I believe ¨CNR flag will be helpful to me.





At 2017-02-13 11:52:50, "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>> wrote:

>I see your point.

>

>

>1)       That is possible. To make the solution complete, I am thinking to add ¨CNR (no-reset) flag.

>

>2)       If you just want to update multiple capsules at one time, current APP already support this feature.

>You may use:

>CapsuleApp Bios.Cap Me.Cap Bmc.Cap

>

>Thank you

>Yao Jiewen

>

>From: wang xiaofeng [mailto:winggundum82@163.com]

>Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2017 6:10 PM

>To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>

>Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>

>Subject: Re:Re: [edk2] CapsuleApp behavior for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule

>

>Hi Jiewen,

>     Sorry, I forgot that I modified Capsuleapp before, Trunk Caspuleapp behavior is like you said" If a capsule has CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET, capsule app will trigger reset". The logic doesn;t have errors.

>But the behavior is a little different from my understanding . Could you think if we can change the behavior to " If a capsule has CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET, capsule app will NOT trigger reset,let user trigger the reset later"?

>The reasons are as the followings:

>1) user cannot distinguish whether the reset is triggered by bios code or application code , there is no difference for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule and CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET + CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET capsule in current design

>2) user may have to update bios capsule , ME capsule ,BMC capsule together,otherwise system cannot work in next reboot. So after bios capsule update done , a reset is not expected. User want to update it later after all capsule are updated.

>

>Anyhow , this is a new feature request and you can decide whether need to add this feature.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>At 2017-02-10 19:24:55, "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com%3cmailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>> wrote:

>

>>That is an interesting question.

>

>>

>

>>A general rule for Capsule App is:

>

>>

>

>>1)       If a capsule has CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET, the CapsuleService will issue reset. No need to handler in CapsuleApp. (The free memory logic will not run)

>

>>

>

>>2)       If a capsule has CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET, the CapsuleService will not issue reset, because CapsuleService will let caller decide when to reset. So here CapsuleApp does reset. (The free memory logic will not run)

>

>>

>

>>3)       If a capsule has no CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET flag, the CapsuleService processes the image immediately. Then CapsuleApp can free the buffer finally, because it is already processed.

>

>>

>

>>May I know where you think we have logic error?

>

>>

>

>>Thank you

>

>>Yao Jiewen

>

>>

>

>>From: wang xiaofeng [mailto:winggundum82@163.com]

>

>>Sent: Friday, February 10, 2017 1:27 AM

>

>>To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com%3cmailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org%3cmailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>

>

>>Subject: CapsuleApp behavior for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule

>

>>

>

>>Hi Jiewen,

>

>>       I think it might be a logic error for CapsuleApp  with CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule. If a capsule only have CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET flag, my understanding it will not trigger reset automatially. User will trigger reset£¨S3) in OS or application like CapsuleApp.

>

>>     CapsuleApp will not trigger reset if CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET is not set, the problem is it will free the capsule buffer also!

>

>>

>

>>Done:

>

>>  for (Index = 0; Index < CapsuleNum; Index++) {

>

>>    if (CapsuleBuffer[Index] != NULL) {

>

>>      FreePool (CapsuleBuffer[Index]);

>

>>    }

>

>>  }

>

>>

>

>>  CleanGatherList(BlockDescriptors, CapsuleNum);

>

>>

>

>>   I trited to remove the above free buffer logic and capsuleApp can work with CAPSULE_FLAGS_INITIATE_RESET only attribute. The capsule data should be kept in this case

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>_______________________________________________

>

>>edk2-devel mailing list

>

>>edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org%3cmailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>

>

>>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

>

>

>




  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-17  1:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-07  6:33 [PATCH] SignedCapsulePkg/EdkiiSystemCapsuleLib: Fix logic error Jiewen Yao
2017-02-07  8:58 ` wang xiaofeng
2017-02-10  9:27   ` CapsuleApp behavior for CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET only capsule wang xiaofeng
2017-02-10 11:24     ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-13  2:09       ` wang xiaofeng
2017-02-13  3:52         ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-02-13  4:46           ` wang xiaofeng
2017-02-17  1:23             ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2017-02-17  1:38               ` wang xiaofeng
2017-02-20  1:27               ` wang xiaofeng
2017-02-23 11:21               ` Tcg2Pei.efi assert after sync to latest trunk wang xiaofeng
2017-02-23 13:01                 ` Gao, Liming
2017-02-24  5:08                   ` wang xiaofeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F0170@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox