From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg/Uefi: pack EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE struct
Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2017 13:24:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F901F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1488543408-27921-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
HI Ard
Thanks to raise this issue.
I agree with you on pack.
I think there is still some confusing in " The EFI System Table entry must point to an array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value."
I am still not clear if it is a proper way to use "an array of capsule headers" to represent the "an array of capsules".
I recommend we ask USWG to clarify the meaning to avoid misunderstanding.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org]
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 8:17 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; leif.lindholm@linaro.org; Kinney,
> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH] MdePkg/Uefi: pack EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE struct
>
> The UEFI specification describes the per-capsule type configuration
> table entry as follows:
>
> The EFI System Table entry must use the GUID from the CapsuleGuid
> field of the EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER. The EFI System Table entry must point
> to an array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value. The
> array must be prefixed by a UINT32 that represents the size of the array
> of capsules.
>
> In the current EDK2 implementation, this is translated into the following
>
> typedef struct {
> ///
> /// the size of the array of capsules.
> ///
> UINT32 CapsuleArrayNumber;
> ///
> /// Point to an array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value.
> ///
> VOID* CapsulePtr[1];
> } EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE;
>
> Note that this implements an array of capsule *pointers* rather than an
> array of capsules. Also, it lacks the #pragma pack(1), resulting in
> padding to be added after the CapsuleArrayNumber.
>
> So let's bring this code in line with the UEFI spec and
> - put the *size* of the array in the leading UINT32 rather than the number
> of entries,
> - pack the struct to remove any padding on 64-bit architectures
> - replace the array of pointers with an array of capsule headers.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Framework/Include/EfiCapsule.h | 6 ++++--
> IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/Capsules.c | 8
> +++++---
> MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleProcessLib.c | 8
> +++++---
> MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h | 8
> +++++---
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Framework/Include/EfiCapsule.h
> b/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Framework/Include/EfiCapsule.h
> index cae8aec1619e..7026a1876961 100644
> --- a/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Framework/Include/EfiCapsule.h
> +++ b/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Foundation/Framework/Include/EfiCapsule.h
> @@ -54,10 +54,12 @@ typedef struct {
> UINT32 CapsuleImageSize;
> } EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER;
>
> +#pragma pack(1)
> typedef struct {
> - UINT32 CapsuleArrayNumber;
> - VOID* CapsulePtr[1];
> + UINT32 CapsuleArraySize;
> + EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER Capsule[1];
> } EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE;
> +#pragma pack()
>
> //
> // This struct is deprecated because VendorTable entries physical address will
> not be fixed up when
> diff --git a/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/Capsules.c
> b/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/Capsules.c
> index 6c7fc7ced4c9..91d21f1d7218 100644
> --- a/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/Capsules.c
> +++ b/IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/Capsules.c
> @@ -172,11 +172,13 @@ BdsProcessCapsules (
> }
> }
> if (CapsuleNumber != 0) {
> - Size = sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE) + (CapsuleNumber - 1) *
> sizeof(VOID*);
> + Size = sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE) + (CapsuleNumber - 1) *
> sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER);
> CapsuleTable = AllocateRuntimePool (Size);
> ASSERT (CapsuleTable != NULL);
> - CapsuleTable->CapsuleArrayNumber = CapsuleNumber;
> - CopyMem(&CapsuleTable->CapsulePtr[0], CapsulePtrCache,
> CapsuleNumber * sizeof(VOID*));
> + CapsuleTable->CapsuleArraySize = Size - sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE);
> + for (Index = 0; Index < CapsuleNumber; Index++) {
> + CopyMem(&CapsuleTable->Capsule[Index], CapsulePtrCache[Index],
> sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE));
> + }
> Status = gBS->InstallConfigurationTable
> (&CapsuleGuidCache[CacheIndex], (VOID*)CapsuleTable);
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> }
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleProcessLib.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleProcessLib.c
> index ba3ff90b9f73..45a0026acacc 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleProcessLib.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibFmp/DxeCapsuleProcessLib.c
> @@ -277,14 +277,16 @@ PopulateCapsuleInConfigurationTable (
> }
> }
> if (CapsuleNumber != 0) {
> - Size = sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE) + (CapsuleNumber - 1) *
> sizeof(VOID*);
> + Size = sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE) + (CapsuleNumber - 1) *
> sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER);
> CapsuleTable = AllocateRuntimePool (Size);
> if (CapsuleTable == NULL) {
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Allocate CapsuleTable (%g) fail!\n",
> &CapsuleGuidCache[CacheIndex]));
> continue;
> }
> - CapsuleTable->CapsuleArrayNumber = CapsuleNumber;
> - CopyMem(&CapsuleTable->CapsulePtr[0], CapsulePtrCache,
> CapsuleNumber * sizeof(VOID*));
> + CapsuleTable->CapsuleArraySize = Size - sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE);
> + for (Index = 0; Index < CapsuleNumber; Index++) {
> + CopyMem(&CapsuleTable->Capsule[Index], CapsulePtrCache[Index],
> sizeof(EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE));
> + }
> Status = gBS->InstallConfigurationTable
> (&CapsuleGuidCache[CacheIndex], (VOID*)CapsuleTable);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "InstallConfigurationTable (%g) fail!\n",
> &CapsuleGuidCache[CacheIndex]));
> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> b/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> index 57cb4e804f70..ad9dfefbccf8 100644
> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> @@ -1630,16 +1630,18 @@ typedef struct {
> /// that contain the same CapsuleGuid value. The array must be
> /// prefixed by a UINT32 that represents the size of the array of capsules.
> ///
> +#pragma pack(1)
> typedef struct {
> ///
> /// the size of the array of capsules.
> ///
> - UINT32 CapsuleArrayNumber;
> + UINT32 CapsuleArraySize;
> ///
> - /// Point to an array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value.
> + /// Array of capsules that contain the same CapsuleGuid value.
> ///
> - VOID* CapsulePtr[1];
> + EFI_CAPSULE_HEADER Capsule[1];
> } EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE;
> +#pragma pack()
>
> #define CAPSULE_FLAGS_PERSIST_ACROSS_RESET 0x00010000
> #define CAPSULE_FLAGS_POPULATE_SYSTEM_TABLE 0x00020000
> --
> 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-03 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-03 12:16 [PATCH] MdePkg/Uefi: pack EFI_CAPSULE_TABLE struct Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-03 13:24 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2017-03-03 13:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A8F901F@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox