From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.24; helo=mga09.intel.com; envelope-from=jiewen.yao@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E604202E611D for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 19:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Oct 2017 20:02:53 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.43,385,1503385200"; d="scan'208";a="163471954" Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Oct 2017 20:02:53 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx154.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.70) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:02:53 -0700 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by FMSMSX154.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 20:02:52 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.175]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.159]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 11:02:51 +0800 From: "Yao, Jiewen" To: "Ni, Ruiyu" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Update MTRR algorithm to calculate optimal settings Thread-Index: AQHTQzbdHkaS10tcfUmzr9bIeqnJ7KLlz1Aw Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 03:02:50 +0000 Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503A9F42AC@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20171012084810.148196-1-ruiyu.ni@intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20171012084810.148196-1-ruiyu.ni@intel.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Update MTRR algorithm to calculate optimal settings X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 02:59:19 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks. Would you mind to share to all of us on which platform has been tested and = which unit test has been done? As such people can have more confidence. With the test description message added, reviewed-by: Jiewen.yao@intel.com Thank you Yao Jiewen > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Ni= , > Ruiyu > Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2017 4:48 PM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] [PATCH 0/4] Update MTRR algorithm to calculate optimal se= ttings >=20 > Ruiyu Ni (4): > UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: refine MtrrLibProgramFixedMtrr() > UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: Optimize MtrrLibLeastAlignment() > UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: Update algorithm to calculate optimal settings > UefiCpuPkg/MtrrLib: Skip Base MSR access when the pair is invalid >=20 > UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/MtrrLib.h | 45 +- > UefiCpuPkg/Library/MtrrLib/MtrrLib.c | 2605 > ++++++++++++++++++++-------------- > 2 files changed, 1550 insertions(+), 1100 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 2.12.2.windows.2 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel