From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 01:37:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503AA20F2C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171116072700.11456-2-jian.j.wang@intel.com>
HI
I have 2 comments:
1) I do not think we need mention: WORKAROUND.
I suggest we just use "NOTE".
We have similar example before, see MdePkg\Library\BasePeCoffLib\BasePeCoff.c
//
// NOTE: Some versions of Linux ELILO for Itanium have an incorrect magic value
// in the PE/COFF Header. If the MachineType is Itanium(IA64) and the
// Magic value in the OptionalHeader is EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR32_MAGIC
// then override the returned value to EFI_IMAGE_NT_OPTIONAL_HDR64_MAGIC
//
2) I agree with Star. I think we should merge the final result.
The suggestion before is: *Keep current UEFI memory map unchanged.*
Changing it brings lots of risk without validating all UEFI OS.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wang, Jian J
> Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 3:27 PM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>; Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities
>
> Some OSs will treat EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute as really
> set attributes and change memory paging attribute accordingly.
> But current EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is assigned by
> value from Capabilities in GCD memory map. This might cause
> boot problems. Clearing all paging related capabilities can
> workaround it. The code added in this patch is supposed to
> be removed once the usage of EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute
> is clarified in UEFI spec and adopted by both EDK-II Core and
> all supported OSs.
>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> index c9219cc068..783b576e35 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c
> @@ -1829,6 +1829,23 @@ CoreGetMemoryMap (
> //
> BufferSize = ((UINT8 *)MemoryMap - (UINT8 *)MemoryMapStart);
>
> + //
> + // WORKAROUND: Some OSs will treat EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute
> as really
> + // set attributes and change memory paging attribute
> accordingly.
> + // But current EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is assigned
> by
> + // value from Capabilities in GCD memory map. This might
> cause
> + // boot problems. Clearing all paging related capabilities can
> + // workaround it. Following code is supposed to be removed
> once
> + // the usage of EFI_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR.Attribute is clarified
> in
> + // UEFI spec and adopted by both EDK-II Core and all
> supported
> + // OSs.
> + //
> + while (MemoryMapStart < MemoryMap) {
> + MemoryMapStart->Attribute &= ~(UINT64)(EFI_MEMORY_RP |
> EFI_MEMORY_RO |
> + EFI_MEMORY_XP);
> + MemoryMapStart = NEXT_MEMORY_DESCRIPTOR(MemoryMapStart,
> Size);
> + }
> +
> Status = EFI_SUCCESS;
>
> Done:
> --
> 2.14.1.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-17 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 7:26 [PATCH v6 0/2] Fix multiple entries of RT_CODE in memory map Jian J Wang
2017-11-16 7:26 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeCore: Filter out all paging capabilities Jian J Wang
2017-11-16 9:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 9:28 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-16 9:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-16 9:48 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-16 16:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-11-17 1:37 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2017-11-17 2:48 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-22 7:30 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-20 20:23 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-11-21 6:29 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-16 7:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Fix multiple entries of RT_CODE in memory map Jian J Wang
2017-11-20 20:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-11-21 6:51 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-22 7:54 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-20 21:08 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503AA20F2C@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox