From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"Kubacki, Michael A" <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>,
"Oram, Isaac W" <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 01:03:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ED077930C258884BBCB450DB737E662259E49A50@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5576 bytes --]
Since there is no other module, I think we can use this specific package name to tell people what it is.
It is also good for feature isolation.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:53 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Hi Jiewen,
So far, I don't have other modules which need to move to this package.
I think UserAuthenticationPkg is too specific, but if others also agree with this name, I'm ok too.
Hi liming, Isaac & Mike,
Any comments about the new package name?
Thanks,
Eric
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:35 AM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
OK. Do you have any other modules what could be potentially in this package?
I think another option is to name it UserAuthenticationPkg, just like SignedCapsulePkg.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:28 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
I think sample means this is an example about how to enable this feature. Code implemented with production quality. Platform can decide whether to use it or not.
Thanks,
Eric
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:06 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Would you please clarify what "sample" here really means? Not for production? Or something else?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:02 PM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Hi Jiewen,
I think SecuritySamplePkg used to save 1) sample implementation for security related features, 2) it's platform scope feature.
SecurityPkg used to save 1) common security features, 2) It's not a sample implementation.
This is just my proposal, If you have better one, you can raise here.
Thanks,
Eric
From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com<mailto:eric.dong@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Would you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ?
What is the difference between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ?
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com<mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com<mailto:isaac.w.oram@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com<mailto:jiewen.yao@intel.com>>
Subject: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Isaac, Jiewen & Mike,
I plan to add a new driver named UserAuthentication. This driver shows a sample implementation about how to control user enter setup page. I plan to add a new package in Platform\Intel folder to save this driver. New package name is SecuritySamplePkg. Any comments for this RFC?
Thanks,
Eric
_._,_._,_
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 17902 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-03 1:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-31 7:46 [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Dong, Eric
2019-05-31 7:49 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-05-31 8:02 ` Dong, Eric
2019-05-31 8:05 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-06-03 0:28 ` Dong, Eric
2019-06-03 0:34 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-06-03 0:52 ` Dong, Eric
2019-06-03 1:03 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2019-06-04 8:24 ` Oram, Isaac W
2019-06-12 13:26 ` Liming Gao
2019-06-14 0:55 ` Oram, Isaac W
2019-06-14 0:57 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-06-18 14:08 ` Liming Gao
[not found] <159EDE4CF381B84A.22232@groups.io>
2019-05-27 2:50 ` Liming Gao
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-05-15 13:28 Liming Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox