From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: intel.com, ip: 134.134.136.126, mailfrom: jiewen.yao@intel.com) Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by groups.io with SMTP; Sun, 02 Jun 2019 18:03:08 -0700 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jun 2019 18:03:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.205]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Jun 2019 18:03:06 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) by fmsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.205) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 18:03:06 -0700 Received: from shsmsx153.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.6.53) by FMSMSX125.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Sun, 2 Jun 2019 18:03:06 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.134]) by SHSMSX153.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.12.192]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:03:04 +0800 From: "Yao, Jiewen" To: "Dong, Eric" , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , "Gao, Liming" , "Kubacki, Michael A" , "Oram, Isaac W" , "Kinney, Michael D" Subject: Re: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Thread-Topic: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Thread-Index: AdUXgumLnb/EiamOTkmGImOkr7H9TwAAkBVg//992oD//3mQUIAEvqwA//94s2CAAI4igP//d0Gw Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 01:03:04 +0000 Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EA@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F67FA7A@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F67FB10@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F686731@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNzlmNDdiNjAtYTI1Yy00MmQ4LThlNzUtNGM3NTIwMzBkNzAzIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoibU5FMklxWHU0Q0N1ZW9IOXRHVFhUNkR4K0Y3V2ZUWWw1VndwemFBVVNmRXQwR0c5OUFmajRtQ2o3R3RiSk5NNSJ9 x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Return-Path: jiewen.yao@intel.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EAshsmsx102ccrcor_" --_000_74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EAshsmsx102ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since there is no other module, I think we can use this specific package na= me to tell people what it is. It is also good for feature isolation. Thank you Yao Jiewen From: Dong, Eric Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:53 AM To: Yao, Jiewen ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <= liming.gao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael A ; Or= am, Isaac W ; Kinney, Michael D Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] Hi Jiewen, So far, I don't have other modules which need to move to this package. I think UserAuthenticationPkg is too specific, but if others also agree wit= h this name, I'm ok too. Hi liming, Isaac & Mike, Any comments about the new package name? Thanks, Eric From: Yao, Jiewen Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:35 AM To: Dong, Eric >; devel@edk= 2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D > Cc: Yao, Jiewen > Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] OK. Do you have any other modules what could be potentially in this package= ? I think another option is to name it UserAuthenticationPkg, just like Signe= dCapsulePkg. Thank you Yao Jiewen From: Dong, Eric Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:28 AM To: Yao, Jiewen >; devel@= edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] I think sample means this is an example about how to enable this feature. C= ode implemented with production quality. Platform can decide whether to use= it or not. Thanks, Eric From: Yao, Jiewen Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:06 PM To: Dong, Eric >; devel@edk= 2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] Would you please clarify what "sample" here really means? Not for productio= n? Or something else? Thank you Yao Jiewen From: Dong, Eric Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:02 PM To: Yao, Jiewen >; devel@= edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] Hi Jiewen, I think SecuritySamplePkg used to save 1) sample implementation for securit= y related features, 2) it's platform scope feature. SecurityPkg used to save 1) common security features, 2) It's not a sample = implementation. This is just my proposal, If you have better one, you can raise here. Thanks, Eric From: Yao, Jiewen Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:49 PM To: Dong, Eric >; devel@edk= 2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D > Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel direct= ory] Would you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ? What is the difference between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ? Thank you Yao Jiewen From: Dong, Eric Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming >; Kubacki, Michael A >; Oram, Isaac W >; Kinney, Michael D >; Yao, Jiewen > Subject: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory] Isaac, Jiewen & Mike, I plan to add a new driver named UserAuthentication. This driver shows a sa= mple implementation about how to control user enter setup page. I plan to a= dd a new package in Platform\Intel folder to save this driver. New package = name is SecuritySamplePkg. Any comments for this RFC? Thanks, Eric _._,_._,_ --_000_74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EAshsmsx102ccrcor_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Since there is no other module, I think we can use this specific = package name to tell people what it is.

It is also good for feature isolation.

 

Thank you

Yao Jiewen

 

From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:53 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; = Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.= kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney= , Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

Hi Jiew= en,

&n= bsp;

So far,= I don’t have other modules which need to move to this package.<= /o:p>

&n= bsp;

I think= Us= erAuthenticationPkg is too specific, bu= t if others also agree with this name, I’m ok too.=

 

&n= bsp;

Hi limi= ng, Isaac & Mike,

&n= bsp;

Any com= ments about the new package name?

&n= bsp;

Thanks,=

Eric

From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:35 AM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@= intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Limi= ng <liming.gao@intel.com>= ; Kubacki, Michael A <mic= hael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michae= l.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.y= ao@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

OK. Do you have any other modules what could be potentially in th= is package?

 

I think another option is to name it UserAuthenticationPkg, just like SignedCapsulePkg.=

 

Thank you

Yao Jiewen

 

From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 8:28 AM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.y= ao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Limi= ng <liming.gao@intel.com>= ; Kubacki, Michael A <mic= hael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michae= l.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

I think= sample means this is an example about how to enable this feature. Code imp= lemented with production quality. Platform can decide whether to use it or = not.

&n= bsp;

Thanks,=

Eric

From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:06 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@= intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Limi= ng <liming.gao@intel.com>= ; Kubacki, Michael A <mic= hael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michae= l.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

Would you please clarify what “sample” here really me= ans? Not for production? Or something else?

 

Thank you

Yao Jiewen

 

 

From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 4:02 PM
To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.y= ao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Limi= ng <liming.gao@intel.com>= ; Kubacki, Michael A <mic= hael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michae= l.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

Hi Jiew= en,

&n= bsp;

I think= SecuritySamplePkg used to save 1) sample implementation for security relat= ed features, 2) it’s platform scope feature.

Securit= yPkg used to save 1) common security features, 2) It’s not a sample i= mplementation.

&n= bsp;

This is= just my proposal, If you have better one, you can raise here.

&n= bsp;

Thanks,=

Eric

From: Yao, Jiewen
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:49 PM
To: Dong, Eric <eric.dong@= intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Limi= ng <liming.gao@intel.com>= ; Kubacki, Michael A <mic= hael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michae= l.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel= directory]

 

Would you please clarify the position of SecuritySamplePkg ?

&n= bsp;

What is= the difference between SecurityPkg and SecuritySamplePkg ?

 

Thank you

Yao Jiewen

 

From: Dong, Eric
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 3:46 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io= ; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.= com>; Kubacki, Michael A <michael.a.kubacki@intel.com>; Oram, Isaac W <isaac.w.oram@intel.c= om>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel dir= ectory]

 

Isaac, = Jiewen & Mike,

 

I plan = to add a new driver named UserAuthentication. This driver shows a sample im= plementation about how to control user enter setup page. I plan to add a ne= w package in Platform\Intel folder to save this driver. New package name is SecuritySamplePkg. Any comments for = this RFC?

&n= bsp;

Thanks,=

Eric

_._,_._,_<= /span>

--_000_74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F6867EAshsmsx102ccrcor_--