Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V2] EmulatorPkg: don't diaplay the cpu current speed

["Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>]

Good list.

What does "memory" mean ? MemoryTest ?

How about put "LockBox" into "S3"?

How about list "EBC" as standalone component?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Wu, Hao A
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 2:02 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>;
> lersek@redhat.com; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> <liming.gao@intel.com>; ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Leif Lindholm
> <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>;
> Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; Andrew Fish
> <afish@apple.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V2] EmulatorPkg: don't diaplay the cpu
> current speed
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> > Zeng, Star
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 10:31 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io; lersek@redhat.com; Ni, Ray; Gao, Liming;
> > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Leif Lindholm; Kinney, Michael D; Liu,
> Zhiguang;
> > Justen, Jordan L; Andrew Fish
> > Cc: Zeng, Star
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V2] EmulatorPkg: don't diaplay the cpu
> > current speed
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf
> Of
> > > Laszlo Ersek
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 4:03 PM
> > > To: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>;
> > > ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>;
> > Kinney,
> > > Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiguang
> > > <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>;
> > > Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
> > > Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch V2] EmulatorPkg: don't diaplay the cpu
> > > current speed
> > >
> > > On 06/05/19 03:10, Ni, Ray wrote:
> > > > Hi everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Hao pushed the patch because:
> > > > 1. it's a bug fix
> > > > 2. it got a R-b.
> > > > I don't think it's his fault.
> > > >
> > > > For #1, it's gap in process.
> > > > For #2, it's my fault. Because even the patch title says EmulatorPkg but
> > the
> > > patch itself changes MdeModulePkg, I am still the person who can
> approve
> > > changes in both packages.
> > > >
> > > > In Maintainers.txt:
> > > > R: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > > >   (especially for Bus, Universal/Console, Universal/Disk,
> > > >    Universal/BdsDxe and related libraries, header files)
> > > >
> > > > The UiApp actually is not in the "especially" part, but the word
> > "especially"
> > > > means I can also R-b to other components. In fact, I am not quite
> > > > qualified on the other components, e.g.: UiApp.
> > > > So I propose to assign clear reviewers for each components in
> > > MdeModulePkg.
> > > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Fully agreed. MdeModulePkg is huge and we should have fine-grained
> > > maintainership assignments.
> >
> > I also agree.
> 
> Thanks all.
> 
> For the review ownership refinement in the MdeModulePkg, how about the
> below steps:
> 
> 1. Work out a major feature list for the MdeModulePkg
> 2. Call for owners for every item in the list.
> 
> 
> A quick and coarse list of major features can be:
> 
> (Just a draft, some key features may be missing or some listed features
> may not be considered as major ones. Feedbacks are welcomed.)
> 
> Acpi
> Bds
> Capsule
> Compress
> Console
> Core (PeiCore, DxeCore, PiSmmCore and etc.)
> Device (peripheral & storage)
> Disk
> HII
> LockBox
> Memory
> PCD
> PCI bus
> Reset
> S3
> SMBIOS
> SMM
> Status Code
> UI
> Variable
> Misc (all the components that do not fit in the above items)
> 
> 
> Any feedbacks/suggestions for such proposal?
> 
> Best Regards,
> Hao Wu
> 
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Laszlo
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>