public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "Chaganty, Rangasai V" <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>, "Lou, Yun" <yun.lou@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 03:40:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F84174E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BCAAFC0A0683754C9A88D2C4E3F3A9C7F2F88BFD@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com>

Thanks. Comment below:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 5:51 AM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device
> Security Policy protocol
> 
> Same feedback as provided in patch1/6.
[Jiewen] Agree. See response in previous email.
I will add structure description in V3.

> In addition, is there a reason to add "EDKII" as prefix in the internal data
> structure names? E.g.
> +typedef struct {
> +  UINT32     Version; // 0x1
> +  UINT32     MeasurementPolicy;
> +  UINT32     AuthenticationPolicy;
> +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY; // this can be named simply as
> "DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY" right?
[Jiewen] I believe it is common practice to add EDKII_ prefix to all data structure.

I did a search in MdeModulePkg.
I do see some EDKII protocol adds EDKII_ prefix for the data structure.
But some of them does not.

I feel better if we add it to avoid namespace confusing.
I am open for discussion.


> 
> Also, on the services "GetDevicePolicy" and "SetDeviceState", is it possible to
> have any other return states than EFI_SUCCESS?
[Jiewen] Good question. I can add something in V3.


> 
> Regards,
> Sai
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yao, Jiewen
> Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 5:31 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security
> Policy protocol
> 
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
> 
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> Cc: Yun Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> ---
>  Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h |
> 84 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git
> a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..cb5a71ad41
> --- /dev/null
> +++
> b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> +/** @file
> +  Device Security Policy Protocol definition
> +
> +  Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> +  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> +
> +**/
> +
> +
> +#ifndef __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> +#define __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> +
> +#include <Uefi.h>
> +#include <Protocol/DeviceSecurity.h>
> +
> +typedef struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL;
> +
> +typedef struct {
> +  UINT32     Version; // 0x1
> +  UINT32     MeasurementPolicy;
> +  UINT32     AuthenticationPolicy;
> +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY;
> +
> +// BIT0 means if the action is needed or NOT
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_MEASUREMENT_POLICY_REQUIRED                 BIT0
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_AUTHENTICATION_POLICY_REQUIRED              BIT0
> +
> +typedef struct {
> +  UINT32     Version; // 0x1
> +  UINT32     MeasurementState;
> +  UINT32     AuthenticationState;
> +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE;
> +
> +// All zero means success
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_SUCCESS                          0
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR                            BIT31
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_UNSUPPORTED
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x0)
> +#define
> EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_GET_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x1)
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_PCI_NO_CAPABILITIES
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x10)
> +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_TCG_EXTEND_TPM_PCR
> (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x20)
> +
> +/**
> +  This function returns the device security policy associated with the device.
> +
> +  @param[in]  This                   The protocol instance pointer.
> +  @param[in]  DeviceId               The Identifier for the device.
> +  @param[out] DeviceSecurityPolicy   The Device Security Policy associated
> with the device.
> +
> +  @retval EFI_SUCCESS                The device security policy is returned
> +**/
> +typedef
> +EFI_STATUS
> +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY) (
> +  IN  EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL  *This,
> +  IN  EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER                *DeviceId,
> +  OUT EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY           **DeviceSecurityPolicy
> +  );
> +
> +/**
> +  This function sets the device state based upon the authentication result.
> +
> +  @param[in]  This                   The protocol instance pointer.
> +  @param[in]  DeviceId               The Identifier for the device.
> +  @param[in]  DeviceSecurityState    The Device Security state associated with
> the device.
> +
> +  @retval EFI_SUCCESS                The device state is set
> +**/
> +typedef
> +EFI_STATUS
> +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_SET_DEVICE_STATE) (
> +  IN  EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL  *This,
> +  IN  EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER                *DeviceId,
> +  IN  EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE            *DeviceSecurityState
> +  );
> +
> +struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL {
> +  UINT32                                   Version; // 0x1
> +  EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY  GetDevicePolicy;
> +  EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_SET_DEVICE_STATE   SetDeviceState;
> +};
> +
> +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiDeviceSecurityPolicyProtocolGuid;
> +
> +#endif
> --
> 2.19.2.windows.1


  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-07  3:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 12:31 [PATCH V2 0/6] Add Device Security driver Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 20:00   ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07  3:22     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07  4:46   ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07  7:13     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 21:50   ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07  3:40     ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2019-11-07  4:55   ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07  7:45     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 22:09   ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07  6:11   ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07  7:17     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityDxe: Add PciSecurity Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07  6:38   ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07  8:41     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] IntelSiliconPkg/SamplePlatformDevicePolicyDxe: Add sample policy Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07  6:55   ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2019-11-07  8:42     ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dsc: Add Device Security component Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3E562C773B.23805@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3F6D7204CF.23805@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 5/6] IntelSiliconPkg/SamplePlatformDevicePolicyDxe: Add sample policy Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3F2A1C2156.31603@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityDxe: Add PciSecurity Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3E9D627794.4494@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 3/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3E0A913641.22120@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 1/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition Yao, Jiewen
     [not found] ` <15D2BB3FAC504840.31603@groups.io>
2019-11-06  6:48   ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 6/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dsc: Add Device Security component Yao, Jiewen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F84174E@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox