From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Chaganty, Rangasai V" <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>,
"Lou, Yun" <yun.lou@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 07:45:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F842397@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D5C352D95@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Sure.
1. add comments to each field of structures like EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY and EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE.
2. add comments to all the macros defined in this patch to explain the meaning and more important how they are going to impact the logic.
I don't believe a PCI/USB BUS driver developer need understand this protocol.
The PCI/USB only need to understand MdeModulePkg/DEVICE_SECURITY_PROTOCOL.
The IntelSiliconPkg/DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL is for the internal implementation of a device security driver. It should be unknown by device driver writer.
Thank you
Yao Jiewen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 12:55 PM
> To: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Chaganty, Rangasai V <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Lou, Yun
> <yun.lou@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device
> Security Policy protocol
>
> Jiewen,
> I am fine with the 1/6 patch that doesn't contain enough comments to describe
> the meaning
> of each field in each structure because I can reach out to the referenced spec to
> understand them.
>
> This 2/6 patch introduces a new protocol but contains very few comments
> (almost none) for each
> structure each field and I cannot reach out to any spec to understand them.
>
> So can you please add comments to each field of structures like
> EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY and
> EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE?
> Also can you please add comments to all the macros defined in this patch to
> explain the meaning and
> more important how they are going to impact the logic.
>
> In general, can you please add enough comments so that a PCI/USB BUS driver
> developer can understand
> the whole flow how this protocol supports the device security?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:31 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Chaganty, Rangasai V
> > <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>; Lou, Yun <yun.lou@intel.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device
> > Security Policy protocol
> >
> > REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2303
> >
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rangasai V Chaganty <rangasai.v.chaganty@intel.com>
> > Cc: Yun Lou <yun.lou@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolicy.h
> > | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolic
> > y.h
> > b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolic
> > y.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000..cb5a71ad41
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++
> > b/Silicon/Intel/IntelSiliconPkg/Include/Protocol/PlatformDeviceSecurityPolic
> > y.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > +/** @file
> > + Device Security Policy Protocol definition
> > +
> > + Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
> > + SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
> > +
> > +**/
> > +
> > +
> > +#ifndef __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> > +#define __EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL_H__
> > +
> > +#include <Uefi.h>
> > +#include <Protocol/DeviceSecurity.h>
> > +
> > +typedef struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> > EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL;
> > +
> > +typedef struct {
> > + UINT32 Version; // 0x1
> > + UINT32 MeasurementPolicy;
> > + UINT32 AuthenticationPolicy;
> > +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY;
> > +
> > +// BIT0 means if the action is needed or NOT
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_MEASUREMENT_POLICY_REQUIRED BIT0
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_AUTHENTICATION_POLICY_REQUIRED BIT0
> > +
> > +typedef struct {
> > + UINT32 Version; // 0x1
> > + UINT32 MeasurementState;
> > + UINT32 AuthenticationState;
> > +} EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE;
> > +
> > +// All zero means success
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_SUCCESS 0
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR BIT31
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_UNSUPPORTED
> > (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x0)
> > +#define
> > EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_UEFI_GET_POLICY_PROTOCOL
> > (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x1)
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_PCI_NO_CAPABILITIES
> > (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x10)
> > +#define EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR_TCG_EXTEND_TPM_PCR
> > (EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE_ERROR + 0x20)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + This function returns the device security policy associated with the device.
> > +
> > + @param[in] This The protocol instance pointer.
> > + @param[in] DeviceId The Identifier for the device.
> > + @param[out] DeviceSecurityPolicy The Device Security Policy associated
> > with the device.
> > +
> > + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The device security policy is returned
> > +**/
> > +typedef
> > +EFI_STATUS
> > +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY) (
> > + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL *This,
> > + IN EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER *DeviceId,
> > + OUT EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY **DeviceSecurityPolicy
> > + );
> > +
> > +/**
> > + This function sets the device state based upon the authentication result.
> > +
> > + @param[in] This The protocol instance pointer.
> > + @param[in] DeviceId The Identifier for the device.
> > + @param[in] DeviceSecurityState The Device Security state associated
> > with the device.
> > +
> > + @retval EFI_SUCCESS The device state is set
> > +**/
> > +typedef
> > +EFI_STATUS
> > +(EFIAPI *EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_SET_DEVICE_STATE) (
> > + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL *This,
> > + IN EDKII_DEVICE_IDENTIFIER *DeviceId,
> > + IN EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_STATE *DeviceSecurityState
> > + );
> > +
> > +struct _EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_POLICY_PROTOCOL {
> > + UINT32 Version; // 0x1
> > + EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_GET_DEVICE_POLICY GetDevicePolicy;
> > + EDKII_DEVICE_SECURITY_SET_DEVICE_STATE SetDeviceState;
> > +};
> > +
> > +extern EFI_GUID gEdkiiDeviceSecurityPolicyProtocolGuid;
> > +
> > +#endif
> > --
> > 2.19.2.windows.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-07 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-31 12:31 [PATCH V2 0/6] Add Device Security driver Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 20:00 ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07 3:22 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 4:46 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 7:13 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 21:50 ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07 3:40 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 4:55 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 7:45 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-06 22:09 ` Chaganty, Rangasai V
2019-11-07 6:11 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 7:17 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityDxe: Add PciSecurity Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 6:38 ` Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 8:41 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] IntelSiliconPkg/SamplePlatformDevicePolicyDxe: Add sample policy Yao, Jiewen
2019-11-07 6:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Ni, Ray
2019-11-07 8:42 ` Yao, Jiewen
2019-10-31 12:31 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dsc: Add Device Security component Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3E562C773B.23805@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 2/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Platform Device Security Policy protocol Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3F6D7204CF.23805@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 5/6] IntelSiliconPkg/SamplePlatformDevicePolicyDxe: Add sample policy Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3F2A1C2156.31603@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 4/6] IntelSiliconPkg/IntelPciDeviceSecurityDxe: Add PciSecurity Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3E9D627794.4494@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 3/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dec: Add ProtocolGuid definition Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3E0A913641.22120@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 1/6] IntelSiliconPkg/Include: Add Intel PciSecurity definition Yao, Jiewen
[not found] ` <15D2BB3FAC504840.31603@groups.io>
2019-11-06 6:48 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH V2 6/6] IntelSiliconPkg/dsc: Add Device Security component Yao, Jiewen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F842397@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox