From: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
To: "Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Enable page table write protection
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 13:35:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <75B70EA2-DA2E-41E5-9580-FA23AB545AC2@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D827630B58408649ACB04F44C510003624CB88D7@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
I do think we need update CPU driver to protect new allocated split page.
If you verified in shell env, I think it will exposed, please add a test to trigger page split in CPU driver.
I recommend to write some unit test to parse page table in shell.
thank you!
Yao, Jiewen
> 在 2017年11月29日,下午8:15,Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com> 写道:
>
> It's in the DxeIplPeim.
>
> By the way, there's an issue in this patch. I forgot to protect page table for 32-bit mode.
> So this patch works only for 64-bit mode. I'll add it in v2 patch.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yao, Jiewen
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 6:56 PM
>> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/2] Enable page table write protection
>>
>> Is this code in CPU driver?
>>
>> thank you!
>> Yao, Jiewen
>>
>>
>>> 在 2017年11月29日,下午6:24,Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com> 写
>> 道:
>>>
>>> Yes, I validated them manually with JTAG debug tool.
>>>
>>> if ((L3PageTable[Index3] & IA32_PG_PS) != 0) {
>>> // 1G page. Split to 2M.
>>> L2PageTable = AllocatePages (1);
>>> ASSERT (L2PageTable != NULL);
>>> PhysicalAddress = L3PageTable[Index3] & PAGING_1G_ADDRESS_MASK_64;
>>> for (Index = 0; Index < EFI_PAGE_SIZE/sizeof (UINT64); ++Index) {
>>> L2PageTable[Index] = PhysicalAddress | AddressEncMask |
>>> IA32_PG_PS | IA32_PG_P | IA32_PG_RW;
>>> PhysicalAddress += SIZE_2MB;
>>> }
>>> L3PageTable[Index3] = (UINT64) (UINTN) L2PageTable | AddressEncMask |
>>> IA32_PG_P | IA32_PG_RW;
>>> SetPageReadOnly (PageTableBase,
>> (EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS)(UINTN)L2PageTable);
>>> }
>>>
>>> The newly allocated page table is set in the SetPageReadOnly() itself
>> recursively, like
>>> above code in which L2PageTable is allocated and then set it to be read-only
>> after
>>> initializing the table content.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Yao, Jiewen
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 5:16 PM
>>>> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>>>> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 0/2] Enable page table write protection
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> May I know if this is validated in uefi shell, that all page table is readonly?
>>>>
>>>> I did not find the code to set new allocated split page to be readonly. Can you
>>>> give me a hand on that?
>>>>
>>>> thank you!
>>>> Yao, Jiewen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 在 2017年11月29日,下午4:47,Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
>> 写
>>>> 道:
>>>>>
>>>>> Write Protect feature (CR0.WP) is always enabled in driver
>>>> UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe.
>>>>> But the memory pages used for page table are not set as read-only in the
>>>> driver
>>>>> DxeIplPeim, after the paging is setup. This might jeopardize the page table
>>>>> integrity if there's buffer overflow occured in other part of system.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch series will change this situation by clearing R/W bit in page
>> attribute
>>>>> of the pages used as page table.
>>>>>
>>>>> Validation works include booting Windows (10/server 2016) and Linux
>>>> (Fedora/Ubuntu)
>>>>> on OVMF and Intel real platform.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jian J Wang (2):
>>>>> UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Check CR0.WP before changing page table
>>>>> MdeModulePkg/DxeIpl: Mark page table as read-only
>>>>>
>>>>> MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.c | 166
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>> MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/X64/VirtualMemory.h | 14 ++
>>>>> UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe/CpuPageTable.c | 65 ++++++++-
>>>>> 3 files changed, 241 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 2.14.1.windows.1
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-29 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 8:46 [PATCH 0/2] Enable page table write protection Jian J Wang
2017-11-29 8:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/CpuDxe: Check CR0.WP before changing page table Jian J Wang
2017-11-29 8:46 ` [PATCH 2/2] MdeModulePkg/DxeIpl: Mark page table as read-only Jian J Wang
2017-11-29 9:15 ` [PATCH 0/2] Enable page table write protection Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-29 10:24 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-29 10:56 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-29 12:15 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-29 13:35 ` Yao, Jiewen [this message]
2017-11-30 0:44 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-30 0:51 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-30 1:16 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-30 1:36 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-30 1:43 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-30 1:46 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-30 1:59 ` Yao, Jiewen
2017-11-30 2:02 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-30 2:36 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-30 1:37 ` Andrew Fish
2017-11-30 1:52 ` Wang, Jian J
2017-11-29 12:38 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-11-29 12:46 ` Wang, Jian J
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=75B70EA2-DA2E-41E5-9580-FA23AB545AC2@intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox