From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.5341.1589423686114605690 for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 19:34:46 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=dxwzJPzH; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=aE5oaWMcCxWQha8pM2KcpEj8oXSTnw3o7aL/yW7pMRc=; b=dxwzJPzHAkZNM2McoZ5dCcJ2Bq FnjLwEFXACrqVOGR1/DhpU9qO6VosWKWVoQPrTqkKxzKiqGqMdvAc96Lele2gFoVkxzcsm9HaBRa7 L9n2aXztoWXDeUyNhcjL6EDLM6rW/8LQviYxv0WBfy9BBPAG3zi2ZvtHGR1knBowjTzk=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ3hs-0001Bp-6N; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:44 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jZ3hr-0006SY-BW; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:43 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9E8161611; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:42 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id EMc8UMZAsjiJ; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:42 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 951F71616AC; Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:42 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Andrew Fish , Leif Lindholm , "Justen, Jordan L" , Peter Grehan References: <20CE2FEE-3844-422E-8DB2-2784C9B56CE9@bsdio.com> <2de7aa2e-a024-3c2b-14c0-161e68c31121@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <764a2a86-6d80-9784-6793-e2a0cfe0a155@bsdio.com> Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 20:34:42 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2de7aa2e-a024-3c2b-14c0-161e68c31121@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1jZ3hr-0006SY-BW;;;mid=<764a2a86-6d80-9784-6793-e2a0cfe0a155@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5026] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: ; sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Laszlo Ersek , devel@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 527 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 14 (2.7%), b_tie_ro: 12 (2.3%), parse: 1.31 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 5.0 (0.9%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.82 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.2 (0.6%), tests_pri_-950: 1.68 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.43 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 73 (13.8%), check_bayes: 71 (13.4%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.0%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (1.5%), b_comp_prob: 2.9 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 50 (9.5%), b_finish: 1.20 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 417 (79.0%), check_dkim_signature: 0.95 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 42 (8.0%), poll_dns_idle: 34 (6.4%), tests_pri_10: 2.00 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 6 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Where to put the bhyve code in the edk2 repo: BhyvePkg, or under OvmfPkg? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US (cc Peter Grehan) On 5/12/20 3:28 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > > If the bhyve community can *permanently* provide reviews / > regression-testing for such OVMF contributors that never use bhyve, that > would significantly increase the stability of bhyve firmware code, and > it would outweigh bhyve's user base (likely) being smaller. Xen > regressions were also reduced when the Xen community finally delegated > designated reviewers to edk2. > > Reviewing and testing patches you don't really care for, but see as > possibly regressive for the platform you do care about, is a *lot* of > work. So I guess it could boil down to how much work your platform's > user base can contribute to the edk2 project. I certainly can't commit to reviewing and manually regression-testing all applicable OVMF patches, since I'm doing this on a volunteer basis and I know there will be days/weeks when my attention shifts elsewhere. The best I could do is provide semi-regular testing and integration perhaps every month, and make available a permanent FreeBSD machine that any contributors/maintainers could remote into in order to do their own testing - in addition to providing integration into the CI system once .NET and Azure Agent support has been fixed on FreeBSD. -- Rebecca Cran