From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.6143.1582711998957145512 for ; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 02:13:19 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Uk1maGZe; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 205.139.110.120, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582711998; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E5Wp6R0yjwy4avnMvTTae4hLqxQcA3WfcQCKXfXluaw=; b=Uk1maGZeYbiBiVyw6u7ferfodbWbBii9pIubIZJ/QsGVemTInV7nzc0C0NkBO45P0Tg/Gu vYQCKkjZBkWaVTtosd1XlKVcR9vC1QtO7+v0z7cpZ4/uIqpec+VxKNt8+qNaaeVWQnT9/7 W9s3S3EfzMHsjAw54S9bsJnkwVPWDwg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-426-iuKI3bJrNV-V0Y3xE61OCw-1; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 05:13:14 -0500 X-MC-Unique: iuKI3bJrNV-V0Y3xE61OCw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B5758017CC; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-185.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.185]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCB590514; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] UefiCpuPkg: LocalApicLib: Export StandardSignatureIsAuthenticAMD function To: devel@edk2.groups.io, eric.dong@intel.com, "Duran, Leo" Cc: "Ni, Ray" References: <1582659566-9893-1-git-send-email-leo.duran@amd.com> <1582659566-9893-2-git-send-email-leo.duran@amd.com> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: <7748cd85-7255-6319-e1a4-c6d12260b4b0@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 11:13:11 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 02/26/20 06:05, Dong, Eric wrote: > Hi Leo, > > Yes, I means you also change the cod position in the c file, so in the patch file, it seems like it has other changes. > My recommendation is to refine the patch to not change the code postion. Indeed I noticed that too. I figured this change -- moving the code around, beyond purely making it public -- was intentional. I assumed the new position of the function within the source code made more sense to Leo. I agree the code movement should be explained at least in the commit message. Thanks Laszlo