From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 10/10] OvmfPkg/BasePciCapLib: suppress invalid "nullptr deref" warning
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:01:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <779ba225-6b82-911b-8cf3-186da186aa78@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <98bcdd29-6df6-b13e-77df-a59b07555d8d@redhat.com>
On 04/15/19 19:31, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/13/19 1:31 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> RH covscan reports the following "nullptr deref" warning:
>>
>>> Error: CLANG_WARNING:
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:312:5:
>>> warning: Dereference of null pointer
>>> # InstanceZero->NumInstancesUnion.NumInstances++;
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:509:7:
>>> note: Assuming 'OutCapList' is not equal to NULL
>>> # if (OutCapList == NULL) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:509:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (OutCapList == NULL) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:518:7:
>>> note: Assuming the condition is false
>>> # if (OutCapList->Capabilities == NULL) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:518:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (OutCapList->Capabilities == NULL) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:529:7:
>>> note: Assuming 'CapHdrOffsets' is not equal to NULL
>>> # if (CapHdrOffsets == NULL) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:529:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (CapHdrOffsets == NULL) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:546:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:549:7:
>>> note: Assuming the condition is true
>>> # if ((PciStatusReg & EFI_PCI_STATUS_CAPABILITY) != 0) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:549:3:
>>> note: Taking true branch
>>> # if ((PciStatusReg & EFI_PCI_STATUS_CAPABILITY) != 0) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:557:5:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:565:12:
>>> note: Assuming 'NormalCapHdrOffset' is > 0
>>> # while (NormalCapHdrOffset > 0) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:565:5:
>>> note: Loop condition is true. Entering loop body
>>> # while (NormalCapHdrOffset > 0) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:570:7:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:574:16:
>>> note: Calling 'InsertPciCap'
>>> # Status = InsertPciCap (OutCapList, CapHdrOffsets, PciCapNormal,
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:235:3:
>>> note: Null pointer value stored to 'InstanceZero'
>>> # InstanceZero = NULL;
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:243:7:
>>> note: Assuming 'PciCap' is not equal to NULL
>>> # if (PciCap == NULL) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:243:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (PciCap == NULL) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:259:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:297:3:
>>> note: Taking false branch
>>> # if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:311:7:
>>> note: Assuming the condition is true
>>> # if (PciCap->Key.Instance > 0) {
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:311:3:
>>> note: Taking true branch
>>> # if (PciCap->Key.Instance > 0) {
>>> # ^
>>> edk2-89910a39dcfd/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c:312:5:
>>> note: Dereference of null pointer
>>> # InstanceZero->NumInstancesUnion.NumInstances++;
>>> # ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> # 310| //
>>> # 311| if (PciCap->Key.Instance > 0) {
>>> # 312|-> InstanceZero->NumInstancesUnion.NumInstances++;
>>> # 313| }
>>> # 314| return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>
>> The warning is invalid: the flagged dereferencing of "InstanceZero" is
>> gated by a condition that is only satisfied if we dereference
>> "InstanceZero" *first*.
>>
>> (Perhaps the analyzer assumes that the OrderedCollectionInsert() call,
>> just before line 259, can change the value of "PciCap->Key.Instance" via
>> the last argument:
>>
>> 254 //
>> 255 // Add PciCap to CapList.
>> 256 //
>> 257 Status = OrderedCollectionInsert (CapList->Capabilities, &PciCapEntry,
>> 258 PciCap);
>> 259 if (RETURN_ERROR (Status)) {
>>
>> That assumption is incorrect.)
>>
>> Add a comment and an ASSERT().
>>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1710
>> Issue: scan-0994.txt
>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c b/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c
>> index 4968d2b478db..c6f2c726509f 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BasePciCapLib/BasePciCapLib.c
>> @@ -298,16 +298,23 @@ InsertPciCap (
>> goto DeletePciCapFromCapList;
>> }
>>
>> //
>> // Now we can bump the instance count maintained in Instance#0, if PciCap is
>> // not the first instance of (Domain, CapId).
>> //
>> if (PciCap->Key.Instance > 0) {
>> + //
>> + // Suppress invalid "nullptr dereference" compiler/analyzer warnings: the
>> + // only way for "PciCap->Key.Instance" to be positive here is for it to
>> + // have been assigned *from* dereferencing "InstanceZero" above.
>> + //
>> + ASSERT (InstanceZero != NULL);
>
> What about adding a STATIC_ANALYZER_HINT() only defined by covscan?
>
> STATIC_ANALYZER_HINT (InstanceZero != NULL);
We'd have to #define STATIC_ANALYZER_HINT in "MdePkg/Include/Base.h",
somehow.
>
> Regardless:
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
Thanks! (For the other reviews too.)
Laszlo
>
>> +
>> InstanceZero->NumInstancesUnion.NumInstances++;
>> }
>> return RETURN_SUCCESS;
>>
>> DeletePciCapFromCapList:
>> OrderedCollectionDelete (CapList->Capabilities, PciCapEntry, NULL);
>>
>> FreePciCap:
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-16 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 23:31 [PATCH 00/10] patches for some warnings raised by "RH covscan" Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 01/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: express IS_SECTION2 in terms of SECTION_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:01 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 02/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in SECTION_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-14 7:19 ` [edk2-devel] " Jordan Justen
2019-04-15 16:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 8:28 ` Liming Gao
2019-04-16 9:04 ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-16 10:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 16:50 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-17 10:08 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 18:48 ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-16 23:25 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 10:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 11:44 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 14:59 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 19:35 ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-18 9:38 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 15:18 ` Liming Gao
2019-04-17 10:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 03/10] BaseTools/PiFirmwareFile: " Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 04/10] MdePkg/PiFirmwareFile: fix undefined behavior in FFS_FILE_SIZE Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:23 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-17 17:52 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-17 18:31 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18 9:06 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 18:31 ` Andrew Fish
2019-04-17 18:36 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18 8:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 8:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 23:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 17:20 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-18 17:59 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-04-18 18:12 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 05/10] OvmfPkg/Sec: fix out-of-bounds reads Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:24 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 06/10] OvmfPkg/QemuVideoDxe: avoid arithmetic on null pointer Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 07/10] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: suppress invalid "deref of undef pointer" warning Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:26 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 08/10] OvmfPkg: suppress "Value stored to ... is never read" analyzer warnings Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-14 8:03 ` [edk2-devel] " Jordan Justen
2019-04-15 16:25 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-16 9:26 ` Jordan Justen
2019-04-16 11:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 09/10] OvmfPkg/AcpiPlatformDxe: catch theoretical nullptr deref in Xen code Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:28 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-12 23:31 ` [PATCH 10/10] OvmfPkg/BasePciCapLib: suppress invalid "nullptr deref" warning Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-15 17:31 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-04-16 11:01 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-04-12 23:36 ` [PATCH 00/10] patches for some warnings raised by "RH covscan" Ard Biesheuvel
2019-04-15 16:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-18 14:20 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=779ba225-6b82-911b-8cf3-186da186aa78@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox