From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.1993.1608583353602318626 for ; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:42:33 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=VAYxCpeo; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5gAqRRlSE6t0L06Nslb28NSxlfTIp12DRkLHdHf+QRw=; b=VAYxCpeoHlu97SKWUloBaUfWfJ hdj7eIo/nXDj5moP1mNEGnUGp1HBbkWSb9Adf2fg8ZmUe7X8CiT1Eo/zDODlhuVkiyb56s/mXjJZm ZuTLjVG+USejp0byTr5WIswbNfT0ZHFf0BQ2KQvdcnGsuhV/7IL5eSfXFchMAhGrgqk8=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1krS0k-00COdA-JP; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:30 -0700 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1krS0k-0004yY-2Q; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:30 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AFF50057A; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:29 -0700 (MST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1Ywo0iQFczsK; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from [10.0.10.142] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7891B50082B; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:29 -0700 (MST) To: rfc@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, gaoliming , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , 'Bret Barkelew' , 'Laszlo Ersek' , "'Gao, Liming'" References: <012801d6d737$22062710$66127530$@byosoft.com.cn> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <78109063-aac9-c99d-4e24-c6a683cc52ad@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2020 13:42:28 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1krS0k-0004yY-2Q;;;mid=<78109063-aac9-c99d-4e24-c6a683cc52ad@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.8 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001, TooManyTo_002,TooManyTo_003,TooManyTo_004,TooManyTo_005,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5001] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.4 TooManyTo_005 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 6x (uncommon) * 0.6 TooManyTo_003 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 4x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_004 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 5x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;rfc@edk2.groups.io, michael.d.kinney@intel.com, gaoliming , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , 'Bret Barkelew' , 'Laszlo Ersek' , "'Gao, Liming'" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 259 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.10 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (4.3%), b_tie_ro: 10 (3.7%), parse: 1.07 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 4.1 (1.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.25 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.9 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.42 (0.5%), tests_pri_-900: 1.12 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 92 (35.4%), check_bayes: 90 (34.8%), b_tokenize: 4.9 (1.9%), b_tok_get_all: 4.4 (1.7%), b_comp_prob: 1.80 (0.7%), b_tok_touch_all: 75 (29.1%), b_finish: 1.09 (0.4%), tests_pri_0: 133 (51.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.58 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 42 (16.3%), poll_dns_idle: 34 (13.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.1 (0.8%), tests_pri_500: 8 (3.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] [RFC] UnitTestFrameworkPkg cmocka submodule alternatives X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 12/21/20 1:14 PM, Michael D Kinney wrote: > Rebecca, > > Are you ok with using a GitHub mirror? Yes, that's fine with me. -- Rebecca Cran