From: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
To: "Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>
Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
Mike Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: portability of ShellPkg
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2018 11:20:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ADF7CDD-1EE8-41ED-BAF5-7AFC9000345C@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D8322CCA-57AA-4D6F-BCFF-4BEE3B54AD56@intel.com>
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com> wrote:
>
> But a NULL lib listed in components section shouldn’t be linked in to anything...
>
Jaben,
A NULL library class means force it to be linked in.
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:70: # [LibraryClasses.ARM] and NULL mean link this library into all ARM images.
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:72: NULL|ArmPkg/Library/CompilerIntrinsicsLib/CompilerIntrinsicsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:75: NULL|MdePkg/Library/BaseStackCheckLib/BaseStackCheckLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:78: NULL|ArmPkg/Library/CompilerIntrinsicsLib/CompilerIntrinsicsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:110: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel2CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:111: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel1CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel1CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:112: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel3CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel3CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:114: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:115: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:116: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:117: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib.inf
ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc:118: NULL|ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib.inf
Libraries can get pulled in via other libraries. The only way to tell for sure is to look at the build report.
$ build -p ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dec -a X64 -t XCODE5 --report-file=report.txt
$ cat report.txt | grep HobLib
/Volumes/Case/UDK2018/MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf
{HobLib: C = HobLibConstructor Time = 19ms}
You can comment out the HobLib reference in the ShellPkg.dsc file and figure out who is using it "#### ffHobLib|MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/DxeHobLib.inf"
$ build -p ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dec -a X64 -t XCODE5 --report-file=report.txt
...
build.py...
/Volumes/Case/UDK2018/ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc(...): error 4000: Instance of library class [HobLib] is not found
in [/Volumes/Case/UDK2018/MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/UefiBootManagerLib.inf] [X64]
consumed by module [/Volumes/Case/UDK2018/ShellPkg/Application/Shell/Shell.inf]
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
> Unless is listed below with the shell INF also, it just test compiles it...
>
> Or so I thought.
>
> On Sep 5, 2018, at 11:04 AM, Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com <mailto:afish@apple.com>> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:30 AM, Carsey, Jaben <jaben.carsey@intel.com <mailto:jaben.carsey@intel.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> How does removing a lib from the components section affect the shell binary output?
>>>
>>> Is the asset at compile time?
>>
>> Jaben,
>>
>> The issue is likely with the HOB lib constructor in the Shell iASSERTing. Leif's example platform supports UEFI, but not PI so it is not expected that HOBs exist.
>>
>> The library has an explicit assumption that HOBs exist, and that is not the case in Leif's platform.
>>
>> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/HobLib.c#L54 <https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/blob/master/MdePkg/Library/DxeHobLib/HobLib.c#L54>
>>
>>
>> VOID *mHobList =
>> NULL;
>>
>>
>> /**
>>
>> Returns the pointer to the HOB list.
>>
>>
>> This function returns the pointer to first HOB in the list.
>>
>> For PEI phase, the PEI service GetHobList() can be used to retrieve the pointer
>>
>> to the HOB list. For the DXE phase, the HOB list pointer can be retrieved through
>>
>> the EFI System Table by looking up theHOB list GUID in the System Configuration Table.
>>
>> Since the System Configuration Table does not exist that the time the DXE Core is
>>
>> launched, the DXE Core uses a global variable from the DXE Core Entry Point Library
>>
>> to manage the pointer to the HOB list.
>>
>>
>> If the pointer to the HOB list is NULL, then ASSERT().
>>
>>
>> This function also caches the pointer to the HOB list retrieved.
>>
>>
>> @return The pointer to the HOB list.
>>
>>
>> **/
>>
>> VOID *
>>
>> EFIAPI
>>
>> GetHobList (
>>
>> VOID
>>
>> )
>>
>> {
>>
>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>>
>>
>> if (mHobList ==
>> NULL) {
>>
>> Status =
>> EfiGetSystemConfigurationTable (&gEfiHobListGuid, &mHobList);
>>
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>
>> ASSERT (mHobList !=
>> NULL);
>>
>> }
>>
>> return mHobList;
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>> /**
>>
>> The constructor function caches the pointer to HOB list by calling GetHobList()
>>
>> and will always return EFI_SUCCESS.
>>
>>
>> @param ImageHandle The firmware allocated handle for the EFI image.
>>
>> @param SystemTable A pointer to the EFI System Table.
>>
>>
>> @retval EFI_SUCCESS The constructor successfully gets HobList.
>>
>>
>> **/
>>
>> EFI_STATUS
>>
>> EFIAPI
>>
>> HobLibConstructor (
>>
>> IN EFI_HANDLE ImageHandle,
>>
>> IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
>>
>> )
>>
>> {
>>
>> GetHobList ();
>>
>>
>> return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>> /**
>>
>> Returns the next instance of a HOB type from the starting HOB.
>>
>>
>> This function searches the first instance of a HOB type from the starting HOB pointer.
>>
>> If there does not exist such HOB type from the starting HOB pointer, it will return NULL.
>>
>> In contrast with macro GET_NEXT_HOB(), this function does not skip the starting HOB pointer
>>
>> unconditionally: it returns HobStart back if HobStart itself meets the requirement;
>>
>> caller is required to use GET_NEXT_HOB() if it wishes to skip current HobStart.
>>
>>
>> If HobStart is NULL, then ASSERT().
>>
>>
>> @param Type The HOB type to return.
>>
>> @param HobStart The starting HOB pointer to search from.
>>
>>
>> @return The next instance of a HOB type from the starting HOB.
>>
>>
>> **/
>>
>> VOID *
>>
>> EFIAPI
>>
>> GetNextHob (
>>
>> IN UINT16 Type,
>>
>> IN CONST VOID *HobStart
>>
>> )
>>
>> {
>>
>> EFI_PEI_HOB_POINTERS Hob;
>>
>>
>> ASSERT (HobStart !=
>> NULL);
>>
>>
>> Hob.Raw = (UINT8 *) HobStart;
>>
>> //
>>
>> // Parse the HOB list until end of list or matching type is found.
>>
>> //
>>
>> while (!END_OF_HOB_LIST (Hob)) {
>>
>> if (Hob.Header->HobType == Type) {
>>
>> return Hob.Raw;
>>
>> }
>>
>> Hob.Raw =
>> GET_NEXT_HOB (Hob);
>>
>> }
>>
>> return
>> NULL;
>>
>> }
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Andrew Fish
>>
>>>
>>> Jaben
>>>
>>>> On Sep 5, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org <mailto:leif.lindholm@linaro.org>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> (This is partly a summary of discussions that have been held on IRC
>>>> and offline, with Alex Graf and Mike Kinney.)
>>>>
>>>> The UEFI Shell, as produced by the contents of ShellPkg, is needed for
>>>> running the UEFI SCT. This has never been problematic before - but now
>>>> we are starting to run SCT on the U-Boot implementation of the UEFI
>>>> interfaces, certain implicit assumptions may need to be made explicit,
>>>> and perhaps reevaluated.
>>>>
>>>> My feeling is the following:
>>>> - The MinUefiShell variant should be sufficient to run SCT.
>>>> - The UEFI Shell as provided by ShellPkg (any flavour) should run on
>>>> any valid UEFI implementation. Where underlying functionality is
>>>> missing for certain commands, those commands should be
>>>> degraded/disabled to let remaining commands function.
>>>>
>>>> Ideally, I would like to see a Readme.md in ShellPkg, basically
>>>> providing a mission statement. I could write one, but I expect the
>>>> people who actually maintain it would be better suited :)
>>>>
>>>> We currently have an issue with running the shell on U-Boot because
>>>> even MinUefiShell pulls in UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib.inf. This
>>>> appears to be inadvertent, since it is also included a few lines
>>>> further down inside an !ifndef $(NO_SHELL_PROFILES) guard.
>>>> So I would propose the following patch (and can send it out properly
>>>> if the maintainers agree):
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc b/ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc
>>>> index 59dd07e0ae..c852abd3f7 100644
>>>> --- a/ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc
>>>> +++ b/ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc
>>>> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ [Components]
>>>> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellLevel3CommandsLib/UefiShellLevel3CommandsLib.inf
>>>> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib/UefiShellDriver1CommandsLib.inf
>>>> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib/UefiShellInstall1CommandsLib.inf
>>>> - ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib.inf
>>>> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork1CommandsLib.inf
>>>> ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib/UefiShellNetwork2CommandsLib.inf
>>>>
>>>> The reason this causes a problem is because this module has a
>>>> dependency on HobLib, which ASSERTS if it does not find any HOBs lying
>>>> around. Since HOBs are a PI concept rather than a UEFI concept,
>>>> ideally we would not terminate the shell if they are missing. However,
>>>> since the HobLib is generic to EDK2, we also shouldn't just go
>>>> stripping ASSERTs out of it. The above patch gives us a way of
>>>> unblocking the SCT on U-Boot UEFI while we consider what to do about
>>>> the bigger question.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> /
>>>> Leif
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-05 18:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-05 17:25 portability of ShellPkg Leif Lindholm
2018-09-05 17:30 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-09-05 17:41 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-09-05 18:03 ` Andrew Fish
2018-09-05 18:05 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-09-05 18:20 ` Andrew Fish [this message]
2018-09-05 18:23 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-09-05 18:33 ` Andrew Fish
2018-09-05 18:53 ` Carsey, Jaben
2018-09-05 18:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-05 19:47 ` Andrew Fish
2018-09-06 2:34 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2018-09-06 9:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-09-06 17:17 ` Kinney, Michael D
2018-09-06 22:31 ` Andrew Fish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7ADF7CDD-1EE8-41ED-BAF5-7AFC9000345C@apple.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox