public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>
To: "Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan" <anbazhagan@hp.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: USB hub port reset
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 04:38:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7F1BAD85ADEA444D97065A60D2E97EE566E4F285@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AT5PR84MB0276E6ED8A9176E974A702B7BABC0@AT5PR84MB0276.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>

I don't catch what you mean. We have had 10ms delay for port reset. Which line of UsbHub.c do you think there is problem? 

Quote from USB2.0 spec:
"Hubs must be able to accept all hub requests and devices must be able to accept a SetAddress() request (refer to
Section 11.24.2 and Section 9.4 respectively) after the reset recovery time 10 ms (TRSTRCY) after the reset is
removed."

Thanks
Feng

-----Original Message-----
From: Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan [mailto:anbazhagan@hp.com] 
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 11:33 AM
To: Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: RE: USB hub port reset

I didn't mean to have extra delays. Am asking whether EDKII have to be updated for 10ms reset recovery time regardless of port status to align with spec?


>From: Tian, Feng [mailto:feng.tian@intel.com] 
>Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 7:46 PM
>To: Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan <anbazhagan@hp.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Cc: Tian, Feng <feng.tian@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: USB hub port reset
>
>Hi, Baranee
>
>Linux wait 10 + 40 ms (TRSTRCY = 10 ms, plus extra 40 ms). Do you mean EDKII should be same with linux to wait more time?
>
>Thanks
>Feng
>
>From: Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan [mailto:anbazhagan@hp.com] 
>Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2016 11:53 AM
>To: mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Tian, Feng <mailto:feng.tian@intel.com>
>Subject: USB hub port reset
>
>EDK2 have reset recovery time of 10ms for hub port based on port status reset bit but USB spec doesn't mention that port status can be used for t6/reset recovery time. Could you please clarify?
>
>USB vendor mentions EDK2 doesn't have reset recovery time on hub port reset and also highlighting EDK2 hub port reset differs from https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/usb/core/hub.c#L2789
>
>-Baranee


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-14  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-13  3:52 USB hub port reset Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan
2016-11-14  1:45 ` Tian, Feng
2016-11-14  3:32   ` Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan
2016-11-14  4:38     ` Tian, Feng [this message]
2016-11-14 13:46       ` Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan
2016-11-15  4:28         ` Tian, Feng
2016-11-15 23:56           ` Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan
2016-11-16  1:45             ` Tian, Feng
2016-11-16  2:00               ` Anbazhagan, Baraneedharan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7F1BAD85ADEA444D97065A60D2E97EE566E4F285@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox