public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "leif.lindholm@linaro.org" <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	"afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
	"Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Cole Robinson" <crobinso@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 16:42:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a53a979-8da6-5543-52c7-563d57d18780@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E384E67@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 12/06/18 15:42, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Hi, all tools_def.template includes all tool chains. Some are not
> used any more. And, there is no verification for them. So, I propose
> to remove them. They are VS2003, VS2005, VS2008, VS2010, DDK3790,
> UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47, ELFGCC, CYGGCC, ICC, ICC11,
> MYTOOLS. If you still use some one of them, please let me know.

I don't know how to reach out to Linux distros (hopefully their
representatives are already subscribed to this list), but we should
really pose this question to them.

Regarding GCC44, that's the compiler in RHEL6, and RHEL6 is not EOL. On
the other hand, I don't see any reason why anyone would prefer RHEL6 to
RHEL7+ (or recent Fedora) for doing upstream edk2 development. (RHEL6
itself does not ship any edk2 firmware platform.)

So, from a Fedora & RHEL perspective, I'm OK with dropping GCC44..GCC47
inclusive (please do keep GCC48). And, outside of the GCC toolchain
family, I'm neutral.

Thanks,
Laszlo


  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-06 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06 14:42 [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template Gao, Liming
2018-12-06 15:42 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-12-06 22:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-10 11:56 ` Leif Lindholm
2018-12-10 12:38   ` Gao, Liming
2018-12-11  7:03     ` David F.
2018-12-12  1:02     ` Hiber He
2018-12-12 14:17       ` Gao, Liming
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-04-16  1:43 Zhang, Shenglei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7a53a979-8da6-5543-52c7-563d57d18780@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox