public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Feng, Bob C" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
	Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>,
	"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	"Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add a pipline to check Ecc issues for edk2 on open ci
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 14:24:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7ac1918a-b153-fcb2-2aa6-46ec89534db6@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C0706E73DB8C124D9B9C38AA364E5D5E060986ED@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 06/04/20 07:38, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 10:27 PM
>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhang, Shenglei <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
>> Cc: Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Bret Barkelew
>> <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>; Kinney, Michael D
>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Sean
>> Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add a pipline to check Ecc issues for
>> edk2 on open ci
>>
>> On 06/03/20 10:48, Zhang, Shenglei wrote:
>>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2606
>>> As planed we will enable Ecc check for edk2 on open ci. And they are
>>> ready now, but these are V2 series. So I expect that contributors in
>>> edk2 community can try using this script when reviewing. And I appreciate
>>> receiving feedback and comments if someone find errors or false positive
>>> issues.
>>>
>>> I created a pipline of EccCheck for my forked edk2.
>>>
>> https://dev.azure.com/shengleizhang/shengleizhang/_build?definitionId=10
>> &_a=summary
>>>
>>> The patch series are big, so the commits are also pushed into my forked
>> tree.
>>> https://github.com/shenglei10/edk2/commits/ECC
>>>
>>> Patches
>>> 1/5: This is a patch to enable python 3.8 for Ecc. It is a tool issues not
>>>      a pipline or script issue. But it is listed here for people willing
>>>      to try this tool.
>>> 2/5: EccCheck.py is a tool to report Ecc issues for commits. It can be run
>>>      on azure servers for open ci, or locally. Its usage is like
>>>      PatchCheck.py.
>>> 3/5: It's a lib necessary for py3 to run Ecc on azure servers. For local
>>>      use, we need to type command
>>>      "py -3 -m pip install antlr4-python3-runtime" first.
>>> 4/5: Windows-EccCheck.yml is a yaml file to configure the newly added
>>>      pipline. The azure uses this to create a pipline.
>>> 5/5: We consider some cases that will report out Ecc issues but they won't
>>>      be fixed, like submodule and industry standard related things. So we
>>>      add two configuration fields "Exception" and "IgnoreFiles" for people
>>>      to use. The patch is a example and the contents in the fields will be
>>>      empty in final version.
>>>
>>> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Bret Barkelew <Bret.Barkelew@microsoft.com>
>>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>>> Cc: Sean Brogan <sean.brogan@microsoft.com>
>>>
>>> v2: Update 2/5, fix the bug that the script can't hanlde multiple commits.
>>
>> Thanks for the ExceptionList / IgnoreFiles features; I think they are
>> really important. I've run ECC in the past, and in some cases it is
>> *way* too strict and opinionated, so I'm sure we'll end up "training"
>> the ExceptionList entry for OvmfPkg.
>>
>> Can you please explain how (if?) ECC is restricted to new code added by
>> a patch series? Patch#2 seems related, but I don't fully understand. It
>> says,
>>
>> "It can only handle the issues, whose line number in CSV report
>> accurately map with their code in source code files."
>>
>> Does that mean that CI performs a full ECC check, but filters out all
>> warning / error messages that do not refer to code lines added in the
>> patch series?
>>
> 
> Yes, I think you get the point.
> Since there are plenty of Ecc issues existing in edk2, we need to filter out the
> issues that are not caused by the patch to be checked in. The actual implementation
> is to create a dictionary for modified files, in which the key word is the modified file and
> the content is the line number scope for added code. Then if the issues in CSV report can
> be mapped with the dictionary, they are marked as real issues.
> 
> And the scanning scope is the folder that the change is located in. For example,
> Someone modifies "FmpDevicePkg\Library\FmpDependencyLib\FmpDependencyLib.c".
> Then the scan scope is "FmpDevicePkg\Library\FmpDependencyLib". It's not a full check
> for edk2, because it will cost much time.

Thank you for the explanation!
Laszlo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-09 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03  8:48 [PATCH v2 0/5] Add a pipline to check Ecc issues for edk2 on open ci Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] BaseTools:ECC needs to update the contents of CParser4 Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-05  4:38   ` [edk2-devel] " Yuwei Chen
2020-06-05  5:11     ` Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] BaseTools/Scripts: Add EccCheck.py Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] pip-requirements.txt: Add Ecc required lib Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] .azurepiplines: Add a pipline to check ECC issues for commits Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03  8:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] MdeModulePkg/MdeModulePkg.ci.yaml: Add configuration for Ecc check Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-03 14:27 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] Add a pipline to check Ecc issues for edk2 on open ci Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-04  5:38   ` Zhang, Shenglei
2020-06-09 12:24     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-06-09 13:10 ` Liming Gao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7ac1918a-b153-fcb2-2aa6-46ec89534db6@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox