From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.8074.1601541960659082583 for ; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:46:00 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=BzOggRQT; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 63.128.21.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601541959; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=6liDUNdsxE2bZMoTgC1lKvU3+EiOdi5MADDvNhrq7Ds=; b=BzOggRQTIv2sJgVJbq7Pgw05NlcCzmwzlkZWfyb68Jc43365ARBEzIKBRPjg+eoeIddajh MOdVJBLrMWDa/QwrbTKiLtLnCEmopTl9mRyXnvibR6DB5PncpVyX0IeFszBMxe08nuwvw9 DS8P7sK9rbDxpYJWphp6Sd+KStsPTTs= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-62-1F2kUrQ_Nq2x5S5Oi9m_wg-1; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 04:45:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1F2kUrQ_Nq2x5S5Oi9m_wg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B269B802B69; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E270D73661; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTogW2VkazItZGV2ZWxdIFRpYW5vY29yZSBjb21tdW5pdHkgcGFnZSBvbiB3aG8gd2UgYXJlIC0gcGxlYXNlIHJldmlldw==?= From: "Laszlo Ersek" To: Leif Lindholm , gaoliming Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, jiewen.yao@intel.com, "'Guptha, Soumya K'" , announce@edk2.groups.io, "'Kinney, Michael D'" , 'Andrew Fish' References: <16383D375E5994D7.27235@groups.io> <005f01d69476$81768bd0$8463a370$@byosoft.com.cn> <20200928120131.GA5623@vanye> <009a01d6970b$a8d60100$fa820300$@byosoft.com.cn> <20200930101325.GE5623@vanye> <6aeab706-9191-af72-c16f-bae0924880d7@redhat.com> Message-ID: <7c1be441-2199-da25-cd2d-e1797a9c776d@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 10:45:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6aeab706-9191-af72-c16f-bae0924880d7@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/01/20 10:44, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > I've been *really* disliking that, for example, the chief MdeModulePkg > reviewers oops, this was a meaning-destroying typo. I meant: "chief maintainers". > don't regularly ACK patches that have been reviewed by > designated reviewers. If those reviewers are considered authoritative > enough to fully approve patches -- and most of them they have push > access already, anyway --, then we should rework Maintainers.txt so that > Maintainer roles be handed out with a finer granularity. If you will: > promote those reviewers to Maintainers, on their respective turfs. Thanks Laszlo