From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.15732.1607096194513515010 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 07:36:34 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=WcWUZ76y; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 216.205.24.124, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1607096193; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=E3guQBqPP9MTeeN+xyHUkRnyczQX4bnsjwoEtRZ0qNU=; b=WcWUZ76y14sNhOrAO5/Ej/n2k3mD0CXEdCoNT4SrohDhzcMoA+IIPI+k1YH2htYYanYXSa CaODFj4J6GEkmTif5ZIozNpUQabQWYAACLKxPMULyqj5ij+6F7sSVoRbgWn+RpRxet/Cu+ nZJIsw9GW/UBNDIwFyNdJROu0x6r1SE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-589-MRQXjoVoN1uAot1mtsm_3A-1; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 10:36:31 -0500 X-MC-Unique: MRQXjoVoN1uAot1mtsm_3A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 212E81005D4D; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:36:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-113-12.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.12]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB3D19C44; Fri, 4 Dec 2020 15:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] OvmfPkg: start using the ECC plugin exception list From: "Laszlo Ersek" To: Sean Brogan , devel@edk2.groups.io, Ard Biesheuvel Cc: James Bottomley , Jordan Justen , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Tom Lendacky , "Leif Lindholm (Nuvia address)" References: <20201204032116.31321-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20201204032116.31321-2-lersek@redhat.com> Message-ID: <7c57b6dc-de1a-8f2b-9b40-c1faf9b46bfe@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 16:36:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=lersek@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Sean, On 12/04/20 16:22, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 12/04/20 05:05, Sean Brogan wrote: >> 3. Running CI locally should not be "somewhat risky".  More work needs >> to be done to identify the root cause of the above behavior but my guess >> is that it has to do with EccCheck and nothing to do with >> pytool-extensions. > > Sorry, I guess I mixed up my references a little bit. I consider running > binaries downloaded from the internet risky (except from the official > repos of my Linux distro(s)). But that's indeed a different topic and I > shouldn't have generalized. Sorry about that. If you have a suggestion to improve the wording here, I'd like to hear that. I'd really like to go ahead with this patch set in one way or another, as it's blocking James's work from being merged. I don't want to merge a commit message here that you find offensive or just plain wrong though, so please suggest an improvement. Ard, do you have any comments please? Thanks Laszlo