From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>, edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>, Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add volatile to mNumberToFinish
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:21:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c720463-787b-e8ea-8809-7a0f18da2141@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479360884-16708-1-git-send-email-michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
On 11/17/16 06:34, Michael Kinney wrote:
> Add volatile qualifier to mNumberToFinish to prevent compiler
> optimization. Also update TransferApToSafeState() to pass in
> UINTN values and treat the mNumberToFinish as an address value
> that is passed to the assembly code.
Is it possible to split these actions into two patches? One for
mNumberToFinish, the other patch for UINTN values.
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
> Cc: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Michael Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c | 10 +++++-----
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h | 12 ++++++------
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> index 3fb6864..4531298 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/CpuS3.c
> @@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ AsmGetAddressMap (
> #define LEGACY_REGION_BASE (0xA0000 - LEGACY_REGION_SIZE)
>
> ACPI_CPU_DATA mAcpiCpuData;
> -UINT32 mNumberToFinish;
> +volatile UINT32 mNumberToFinish;
> MP_CPU_EXCHANGE_INFO *mExchangeInfo;
> BOOLEAN mRestoreSmmConfigurationInS3 = FALSE;
> VOID *mGdtForAp = NULL;
> @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ MPRendezvousProcedure (
> CPU_REGISTER_TABLE *RegisterTableList;
> UINT32 InitApicId;
> UINTN Index;
> - UINT32 TopOfStack;
> + UINTN TopOfStack;
> UINT8 Stack[128];
>
> ProgramVirtualWireMode ();
> @@ -403,10 +403,10 @@ MPRendezvousProcedure (
> //
> // Place AP into the safe code, count down the number with lock mechanism in the safe code.
> //
> - TopOfStack = (UINT32) (UINTN) Stack + sizeof (Stack);
> - TopOfStack &= ~(UINT32) (CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1);
> + TopOfStack = (UINTN) Stack + sizeof (Stack);
This change looks good.
> + TopOfStack &= ~(CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT - 1);
Please don't drop the UINT32 cast from before the bit-neg altogether,
instead please turn it into a UINTN cast.
The reason is that CPU_STACK_ALIGNMENT has type "int", so the bit-neg
flips the sign bit too. The resultant value is a negative integer.
Due to the two's complement representation, the negative value is
actually correct, and when it is converted to UINTN, for the sake of the
"&" operation that's inherent in "&=", the behavior is correct. But this
silently relies on two's complement, which in my personal opinion is a
bad thing. I consider the changing of sign bits with direct bit
operations a sin :) -- unless mangling the sign bit is our express
purpose -- so I request that we please convert the int value first to
the unsigned type with correct width (here, UINTN), and then negate the
bits.
> CopyMem ((VOID *) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, mApHltLoopCodeTemplate, sizeof (mApHltLoopCodeTemplate));
> - TransferApToSafeState ((UINT32) (UINTN) mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, &mNumberToFinish);
> + TransferApToSafeState ((UINTN)mApHltLoopCode, TopOfStack, (UINTN)(VOID *)&mNumberToFinish);
> }
>
> /**
The (VOID*) cast is unnecessary here (in the last arg), any pointer can
be cast to UINTN directly.
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> index 9760373..d57eb33 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/Ia32/SmmFuncsArch.c
> @@ -98,23 +98,23 @@ InitGdt (
> /**
> Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
>
> - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
> - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
Should we replace "32-bit" with "natural width"?
> + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
>
> **/
> VOID
> TransferApToSafeState (
> - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> )
> {
> SwitchStack (
> - (SWITCH_STACK_ENTRY_POINT) (UINTN) ApHltLoopCode,
> - NumberToFinish,
> + (SWITCH_STACK_ENTRY_POINT)ApHltLoopCode,
> + (VOID *)NumberToFinishAddress,
> NULL,
> - (VOID *) (UINTN) TopOfStack
> + (VOID *)TopOfStack
> );
> //
> // It should never reach here
Looks okay.
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> index 88d9c85..38dd9fa 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm.h
> @@ -828,16 +828,16 @@ GetAcpiS3EnableFlag (
> /**
> Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
>
> - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
> - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
If we update the comment, we should do it here too.
> + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
>
> **/
> VOID
> TransferApToSafeState (
> - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> );
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> index 6844c3f..d45fed2 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/X64/SmmFuncsArch.c
> @@ -103,24 +103,24 @@ GetProtectedModeCS (
> /**
> Transfer AP to safe hlt-loop after it finished restore CPU features on S3 patch.
>
> - @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
and here
> - @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> - @param[in] NumberToFinish Semaphore of APs finish count.
> + @param[in] ApHltLoopCode The 32-bit address of the safe hlt-loop function.
> + @param[in] TopOfStack A pointer to the new stack to use for the ApHltLoopCode.
> + @param[in] NumberToFinishAddress Address of Semaphore of APs finish count.
>
> **/
> VOID
> TransferApToSafeState (
> - IN UINT32 ApHltLoopCode,
> - IN UINT32 TopOfStack,
> - IN UINT32 *NumberToFinish
> + IN UINTN ApHltLoopCode,
> + IN UINTN TopOfStack,
> + IN UINTN NumberToFinishAddress
> )
> {
> AsmDisablePaging64 (
> GetProtectedModeCS (),
> - (UINT32) (UINTN) ApHltLoopCode,
> - (UINT32) (UINTN) NumberToFinish,
> + (UINT32)ApHltLoopCode,
> + (UINT32)NumberToFinishAddress,
> 0,
> - TopOfStack
> + (UINT32)TopOfStack
> );
> //
> // It should never reach here
>
Looks good to me.
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-17 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 5:34 [Patch] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Add volatile to mNumberToFinish Michael Kinney
2016-11-17 10:21 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-11-17 16:06 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-11-17 20:59 ` Kinney, Michael D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c720463-787b-e8ea-8809-7a0f18da2141@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox