From: Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
"Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe] Why do we delay 2s for ESC being pressed?
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 21:34:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c7d448c-bd00-954a-dcf4-8f83f98f43d6@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171108090713.5hof77t5l3gikpwk@sirius.home.kraxel.org>
On 11/08/2017 05:07 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 04:44:37PM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
>>
>> 在 11/8/2017 4:34 PM, Ni, Ruiyu 写道:
>>> No.
>>> Even a terminal tool can recognize F10, it still needs to translate it into "ESC [ V"
>>> and send the three bytes to firmware.
>> Got it. But the 2 seconds timeout is not for this situation, right? If
>> terminal tool could translate and send the key sequence, I think it can
>> complete 3 bytes transfer in a very short time, isn't it? E.g. 9600 baud / 8
>> = 1200 Bytes/s (ignore control bits).
>>
>> So 2 seconds timeout is still for user to enter the sequence "ESC [ V"
>> manually?
> No. Alot of software has this kind of delay because it is recommended
> in some classic unix documentation to avoid mis-interpreting incomplete
> terminal control sequences coming from slow terminals.
>
> Where a "slow terminal" which actually would need such a long delay is a
> physical terminal from the 70ies of the last century, or a virtual
> terminal hooked up over a *really* slow network connection.
>
> Reducing the delay from 2 seconds to roughly 0.2 seconds should be
> pretty safe, things are not that slow any more these days :)
That will be great if we can make such change :)
Thanks,
Heyi
>
> HTH,
> Gerd
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-08 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-08 7:04 [MdeModulePkg/TerminalDxe] Why do we delay 2s for ESC being pressed? Heyi Guo
2017-11-08 7:24 ` Zeng, Star
2017-11-08 7:55 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08 8:30 ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08 8:34 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08 8:44 ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08 8:46 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2017-11-08 8:51 ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-08 9:07 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2017-11-08 13:34 ` Heyi Guo [this message]
2017-11-08 16:00 ` Brian J. Johnson
2017-11-24 7:21 ` Heyi Guo
2017-11-28 17:55 ` Brian J. Johnson
2017-11-29 4:18 ` Andrew Fish
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7c7d448c-bd00-954a-dcf4-8f83f98f43d6@linaro.org \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox