Hi Heinrich, I guess it is not allowed to make them the same now, so I submitted V2, added your recomended fix message to the commit message, and also added more reviewers. Thanks, Chao On 2024/2/27 09:15, Chao Li wrote: > > Hi Heinrich, > > On 2024/2/26 19:02, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> On 26.02.24 11:17, Chao Li wrote: >>> DevicePathFromTextBBTextCoverage.c function CreateDNSDeviceNode has a >>> bug, code: >>> >>> SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr1, (EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS *)(DNS + sizeof >>> (DNS_DEVICE_PATH))); >>> >>> DNS is a pointer, which is increased by a structure size and converted >>> to EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS*, which will point to an unknown address. So fix >>> it. >> >> Hello Chao, >> >> thanks for diving into this. >> >> Please, add >> >> Fixes: 847e0363e846 ("SctPkg: Fix the UefiSct >> -Wincompatible-pointer-types warnings") >> >>> >>> BZ: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4712 >>> >>> Cc: G Edhaya Chandran >>> Cc: Barton Gao >>> Cc: Carolyn Gjertsen >>> Signed-off-by: Chao Li >>> --- >>>   .../BlackBoxTest/DevicePathFromTextBBTestCoverage.c       | 8 >>> ++++---- >>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git >>> a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/DevicePathFromText/BlackBoxTest/DevicePathFromTextBBTestCoverage.c >>> b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/DevicePathFromText/BlackBoxTest/DevicePathFromTextBBTestCoverage.c >>> >>> index c96ee246..bd11c25a 100644 >>> --- >>> a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/DevicePathFromText/BlackBoxTest/DevicePathFromTextBBTestCoverage.c >>> +++ >>> b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/DevicePathFromText/BlackBoxTest/DevicePathFromTextBBTestCoverage.c >>> @@ -1734,13 +1734,13 @@ CreateDNSDeviceNode ( >>>     } >>> >>>     if (DNS->IsIPv6 == 0) { >>> -    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr1, (EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS *)(DNS + sizeof >>> (DNS_DEVICE_PATH))); >>> -    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr2, (EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS *)(DNS + sizeof >>> (DNS_DEVICE_PATH) + sizeof(EFI_IP_ADDRESS))); >>> +    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr1, (EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS *)((UINT8 *)DNS + >>> sizeof (DNS_DEVICE_PATH))); >>> +    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr2, (EFI_IPv4_ADDRESS *)((UINT8 *)DNS + >>> sizeof (DNS_DEVICE_PATH) + sizeof(EFI_IP_ADDRESS))); >>>     } >>> >>>     if (DNS->IsIPv6 == 1) { >>> -    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr1, (EFI_IPv6_ADDRESS *)(DNS + sizeof >>> (DNS_DEVICE_PATH))); >>> -    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr2, (EFI_IPv6_ADDRESS *)(DNS + sizeof >>> (DNS_DEVICE_PATH) + sizeof(EFI_IP_ADDRESS))); >>> +    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr1, (EFI_IPv6_ADDRESS *)((UINT8 *)DNS + >>> sizeof (DNS_DEVICE_PATH))); >>> +    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr2, (EFI_IPv6_ADDRESS *)((UINT8 *)DNS + >>> sizeof (DNS_DEVICE_PATH) + sizeof(EFI_IP_ADDRESS))); >> >> The change looks correct. >> >> I would prefer using the fields of the DNS_DEVICE_PATH typedef from >> MdePkg/Include/Protocol/DevicePath.h to avoid the conversions: >> >> > +    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr1, &DNS->DnsServerIp[0].v4) >> > +    SctStrToIPv4Addr (&IpStr2, &DNS->DnsServerIp[1].v4) >> >> > +    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr1, &DNS->DnsServerIp[0].v6) >> > +    SctStrToIPv6Addr (&IpStr2, &DNS->DnsServerIp[1].v6) > I also prefer this way, but the definition of DNS in > UEFI/Protocol/DevicePath.h is not same as the MdePkg version, should > we make them the same? >> >> Best regards >> >> Heinrich >> >>>     } >>> >>>     return (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL *) DNS; >>> -- >>> 2.27.0 >> >> >> >> >> > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#116005): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116005 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104579419/7686176 Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [rebecca@openfw.io] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-