public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2018 19:40:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fcaa55c-abf5-25ff-2a08-6168ee10fd01@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E2C4BDF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On 08/02/18 17:40, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Laszlo:
>   I understand this patch set is to provide the way to append compile and link option for BaseTools source build.

Yes.

> If so, the extend flag name may be EXTRA_CCFLAGS

I can rename EXTRA_OPTFLAGS to EXTRA_CCFLAGS, but in that case,
internally we will have:

  BUILD_OPTFLAGS = -O2 $(EXTRA_CCFLAGS)

in "header.makefile". In that case, I expect to receive a comment that
we shouldn't append a generic "CCFLAGS" variable to a more specialized
"OPTFLAGS" variable.

Obviously, I can rename "BUILD_OPTFLAGS" to "BUILD_CCFLAGS" as well --
but, in that case, I expect to receive a comment that we already have
"BUILD_CFLAGS".

The variable (more precisely, "RPM macro") that the Fedora distribution
will put into EXTRA_OPTFLAGS is also called %{optflags}. So I think
EXTRA_OPTFLAGS is an appropriate name.


If you still disagree, then can you please suggest a new name not just
for EXTRA_OPTFLAGS (-->EXTRA_CCFLAGS), but also for BUILD_OPTFLAGS?
Patch #3 explains why we need a separate BUILD_OPTFLAGS Makefile macro.


> and EXTRA_LDFLAGS.

Right, that's the currently proposed name.

> And, the extend flags are appended in the tail. 

Correct.

>   Besides, Pccts is the internal tool to generate VfrCompiler syntax source file. It is not used in build process. I am not sure why they also require the additional CC and LD flags.

It's a general policy thing; all native binaries should be built with
the system-wide flags. Some of those flags will let the binaries detect
some buffer overflows automatically, for example, which is helpful even
if the utility is never installed / packaged, just used as a one-off
build tool.

Thanks!
Laszlo

> 
> Thanks
> Liming
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 8:44 AM
>> To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
>> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Zhu, Yonghong <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
>> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
>>
>> Repo:   https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
>> Branch: extra_flags_rhbz1540244
>>
>> In the Fedora distribution, we'd like to pass system-wide flags related
>> to optimization and linking when the C and C++ language base tools are
>> built. This series lets the outermost "make" command push the
>> EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS macros into the BaseTools build.
>>
>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
>> Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Laszlo
>>
>> Laszlo Ersek (6):
>>   BaseTools/footer.makefile: expand BUILD_CFLAGS last for C files too
>>   BaseTools/header.makefile: remove "-c" from BUILD_CFLAGS
>>   BaseTools/Source/C: split "-O2" to BUILD_OPTFLAGS
>>   BaseTools/Pccts: clean up antlr and dlg makefiles
>>   BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS from the caller
>>   BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
>>
>>  BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/footer.makefile       |  2 +-
>>  BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile       | 16 ++++++++---
>>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/GNUmakefile          | 11 +++++---
>>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/Pccts/antlr/makefile | 22 ++++++++++-----
>>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/Pccts/dlg/makefile   | 28 +++++++++++++-------
>>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-02 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26  0:44 [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] BaseTools/footer.makefile: expand BUILD_CFLAGS last for C files too Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] BaseTools/header.makefile: remove "-c" from BUILD_CFLAGS Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] BaseTools/Source/C: split "-O2" to BUILD_OPTFLAGS Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] BaseTools/Pccts: clean up antlr and dlg makefiles Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS from the caller Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS " Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-02 15:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and " Gao, Liming
2018-08-02 17:40   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2018-08-06 14:48     ` Gao, Liming
2018-08-06 15:18       ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-06 16:41         ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-07  5:27           ` Gao, Liming
2018-08-07 12:23             ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-08 21:15               ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fcaa55c-abf5-25ff-2a08-6168ee10fd01@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox