Re: Poll: When to use OVMF and Nt32?

["Richardson, Brian" <brian.richardson@intel.com>]

Thomas:

I generally recommend NT32 when developing UEFI applications that don't have dependencies for any specific hardware design/architecture, and only rely on UEFI Boot Services.

OVMF is running on virtualized hardware, so it's better for the following scenarios...
* Testing boot to an operating system and/or UEFI Runtime services (supports call to Exit Boot Services)
* Testing applications that have a dependency on a specific hardware design/architecture

OVMF is also better for EDK II development under Linux, since NT32 only executes under Microsoft Windows environments.

Thanks ... br
---
Brian Richardson, Senior Technical Marketing Engineer, Intel Software
brian.richardson@intel.com -- @intel_brian (Twitter & WeChat)
https://software.intel.com/en-us/meet-the-developers/evangelists/team/brian-richardson 

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Palmer, Thomas
Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2018 1:47 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2] Poll: When to use OVMF and Nt32?


EDK2 community,

                When developing/testing UEFI and you can easily choose between using OVMF and Nt32, which do you choose and why?  When is OVMF better/easier to use than Nt32 and vice versa?

                I ask because I am giving an internal presentation to our newer employees.  I've used one over the other for personal reasons, but I'd like to hear your thoughts and learn something new.


Regards,

Thomas Palmer
Firmware Engineer
Enterprise Group
Industry Standard Servers

thomas.palmer@hpe.com<mailto:thomas.palmer@hpe.com>
T +1 281 518 2564
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
11445 Compaq Center Drive West
Houston, TX 77070-1433
USA

[cid:image001.jpg@01D1CF0D.54B64190]

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel