From: "Andrew Fish" <afish@apple.com>
To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>, wpaul@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Issues with CLANGDWARF tool specification and X64 -- am I nuts or what?
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 09:12:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <82BBE0CA-8378-4323-84CB-4AE023F6580D@apple.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1919126.R0FQcr2YjX@core>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 12762 bytes --]
> On Jan 11, 2022, at 10:02 AM, Bill Paul <wpaul@windriver.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, regarding 3) below, it looks like this is expected behavior from Clang/
> LLVM. Dereferencing a NULL pointer is technically undefined in C, and by
> default the Clang optimizer will cause a trap to occur if you try to do it
> (because it assumes it's not safe for programs to do that).
>
> The flag -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks can be used to avoid this behavior.
> This flag seems to be valid for Clang 9 and later. This is slightly more
> efficient than using the volatile keyword to defeat the optimizer. This flag
> is also for GCC.
>
Given it is undefined behavior and the compiler is behaving correctly I think it is better to write correct C code and use volatile if you mean to use a NULL pointer.
Not to mention I worked hard to get clang to emit the trap. If was very painful debugging issues like this when the function just ends in the middle and you fall into the next function.
Thanks,
Andrew Fish
> -Bill
>
>> Hello all:
>>
>> Recently I discovered that you can enable CSM compatibility mode in OVMF and
>> decided to build some images with this feature Because Of Reasons (tm). My
>> platform is:
>>
>> FreeBSD/amd64 12.2-RELEASE
>> Clang/LLVM 10.0.1
>> QEMU 6.2.0
>>
>> These days FreeBSD uses Clang as its native compiler. 12.2-RELEASE comes
>> with version 10.0.1, but you also have the option of installing more recent
>> Clang/ LLVM versions up to 12.0.1 as supplemental packages. I noticed that
>> CLANGDWARF is a supported tool spec for the X64 and IA32 build targets so I
>> decided to try that.
>>
>> Unfortunately I ran into a couple of problems:
>>
>> 1) Compilation of OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c fails due to
>> uninitialized local variable.
>>
>> /mnt/home/wpaul/edk2/edk2/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c:
>> 1875:9: error: variable 'Compacted' is used uninitialized whenever 'if'
>> condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
>> if (EcxIn == 1) {
>> ^~~~~~~~~~
>> /mnt/home/wpaul/edk2/edk2/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c:
>> 1895:12: note: uninitialized use occurs here
>> Compacted
>> ^~~~~~~~~
>> /mnt/home/wpaul/edk2/edk2/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c:
>> 1875:5: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
>> if (EcxIn == 1) {
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> /mnt/home/wpaul/edk2/edk2/OvmfPkg/Library/VmgExitLib/VmgExitVcHandler.c:
>> 1871:37: note: initialize the variable 'Compacted' to silence this warning
>> BOOLEAN Compacted;
>> ^
>> = '\0'
>>
>> I changed line 1871 to:
>>
>> BOOLEAN Compacted = FALSE;
>>
>> and that fixed it. I suspect this may be a case where Clang is being a bit
>> more strict than GCC about uninitialized variables.
>>
>> 2) Linking fails with numerous errors of the following kind:
>>
>> ld.lld: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_X86_64_64 against local
>> symbol in readonly segment; recompile object files with -fPIC or pass '-Wl,-
>> z,notext' to allow text relocations in the output
>>
>>>>> defined in
>>>>> /mnt/home/wpaul/edk2/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/RELEASE_CLANGDWARF/X64/
>>
>> UefiCpuPkg/Library/CpuExceptionHandlerLib/SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib/OUTPU
>> T/ SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib.lib(ExceptionHandlerAsm.obj)
>>
>> If I edit tools_def.txt and change RELEASE_CLANGDWARF_X64_DLINK_FLAGS so
>> that it includes -Wl,-z,notext as the error suggests, then everything links
>> as expected. (The same thing is needed for DEBUG_CLANGDWARF_X64_DLINK_FLAGS
>> and probably NOOPT_CLANGDWARF_X64_DLINK_FLAGS.)
>>
>> This problem only occurs when building for X64. IA32 seems ok.
>>
>> Is there any particular reason why these flags aren't there already?
>>
>> 3) Although fixing the above two problems allows me to produce a complete
>> OVMF.fd image, it crashes at start-up with the runtime error:
>>
>> !!!! X64 Exception Type - 06(#UD - Invalid Opcode) CPU Apic ID - 00000000
>> !!!!
>> RIP - 000000007EC8A7DB, CS - 0000000000000038, RFLAGS - 0000000000010206
>> RAX - 0000000000000000, RCX - 000000007F5A0880, RDX - 000000007FF2BAE0
>> RBX - 000000007FF2BBF0, RSP - 000000007FF2BB20, RBP - 000000005A1C5000
>> RSI - 000000007FF2BB48, RDI - 0000000000000000
>> R8 - 0000000000000008, R9 - 0000000000000000, R10 - 0000000000000000
>> R11 - 000000007FF41C90, R12 - 0000000000058080, R13 - 000000007FF2BC20
>> R14 - 00000000000F6DB0, R15 - 0000000000000000
>> DS - 0000000000000030, ES - 0000000000000030, FS - 0000000000000030
>> GS - 0000000000000030, SS - 0000000000000030
>> CR0 - 0000000080010033, CR2 - 0000000000000000, CR3 - 000000007FC01000
>> CR4 - 0000000000000668, CR8 - 0000000000000000
>> DR0 - 0000000000000000, DR1 - 0000000000000000, DR2 - 0000000000000000
>> DR3 - 0000000000000000, DR6 - 00000000FFFF0FF0, DR7 - 0000000000000400
>> GDTR - 000000007F9EC000 0000000000000047, LDTR - 0000000000000000
>> IDTR - 000000007F5A4018 0000000000000FFF, TR - 0000000000000000
>> FXSAVE_STATE - 000000007FF2B780
>> !!!! Find image based on IP(0x7EC8A7DB) (No PDB)
>> (ImageBase=000000007EC87000, EntryPoint=000000007EC8D7A6) !!!!
>>
>> The same thing occurs for IA32:
>>
>> !!!! IA32 Exception Type - 06(#UD - Invalid Opcode) CPU Apic ID - 00000000
>> !!!!
>> EIP - 7ECF72D4, CS - 00000010, EFLAGS - 00010206
>> EAX - 00000008, ECX - 00000000, EDX - 7F8EEE10, EBX - 5000A19D
>> ESP - 7FF33D44, EBP - 7FF33E4C, ESI - 7FF33D4C, EDI - 7ECFB04C
>> DS - 00000008, ES - 00000008, FS - 00000008, GS - 00000008, SS -
>> 00000008 CR0 - 80010033, CR2 - 00000000, CR3 - 7FC01000, CR4 - 00000660
>> DR0 - 00000000, DR1 - 00000000, DR2 - 00000000, DR3 - 00000000
>> DR6 - FFFF0FF0, DR7 - 00000400
>> GDTR - 7F9EC000 00000047, IDTR - 7F5E5010 000007FF
>> LDTR - 00000000, TR - 00000000
>> FXSAVE_STATE - 7FF33A80
>> !!!! Find image based on IP(0x7ECF72D4) (No PDB)
>> (ImageBase=000000007ECF4000, EntryPoint=000000007ECF9FBD) !!!!
>>
>> This one had me going for a while, but I eventually traced it down to
>> LegacyBiosInt86() in OvmfPkg/Csm/LegacyBiosDxe/Thunk.c.
>>
>> In that function, there is this code:
>>
>> UINT16 Segment;
>> UINT16 Offset;
>> [...]
>> //
>> // The base address of legacy interrupt vector table is 0.
>> // We use this base address to get the legacy interrupt handler.
>> //
>> ACCESS_PAGE0_CODE (
>> Segment = (UINT16)(((UINT32 *)0)[BiosInt] >> 16);
>> Offset = (UINT16)((UINT32 *)0)[BiosInt];
>> );
>>
>> As the comment notes, here, we're trying to directly read from address 0
>> using BiosInt as an offset. This seems to trigger a problem with the Clang
>> optimizer. The disassembled output looks like this:
>>
>> 0000000000003786 <LegacyBiosInt86>:
>> 3786: 56 push %rsi
>> 3787: 48 83 ec 60 sub $0x60,%rsp
>> 378b: 41 0f b7 40 18 movzwl 0x18(%r8),%eax
>> 3790: 25 d4 0c 00 00 and $0xcd4,%eax
>> 3795: 0d 02 30 00 00 or $0x3002,%eax
>> 379a: 66 41 89 40 18 mov %ax,0x18(%r8)
>> 379f: 48 8d 74 24 28 lea 0x28(%rsp),%rsi
>> 37a4: 48 83 66 18 00 andq $0x0,0x18(%rsi)
>> 37a9: 48 8b 05 a8 59 00 00 mov 0x59a8(%rip),%rax #
>> 9158 <gDS>
>> 37b0: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx
>> 37b2: 48 89 f2 mov %rsi,%rdx
>> 37b5: ff 50 38 call *0x38(%rax)
>> 37b8: 4c 8b 46 18 mov 0x18(%rsi),%r8
>> 37bc: 41 0f ba e0 0d bt $0xd,%r8d
>> 37c1: 73 18 jae 37db <LegacyBiosInt86+0x55>
>> 37c3: 48 8b 05 8e 59 00 00 mov 0x598e(%rip),%rax #
>> 9158 <gDS>
>> 37ca: 49 81 e0 ff df ff ff and $0xffffffffffffdfff,%r8
>> 37d1: ba 00 10 00 00 mov $0x1000,%edx
>> 37d6: 31 c9 xor %ecx,%ecx
>> 37d8: ff 50 40 call *0x40(%rax)
>> 37db: 0f 0b ud2 <--- er... what?
>>
>> Note the "ud2" instruction. I have no idea what that's supposed to be, but
>> it looks like Clang just gives up generating any further instructions once
>> it hits this code.
>>
>> I reduced this to a very simple sample C program that also reproduces the
>> problem:
>>
>> #include <stdint.h>
>>
>> extern int somefunc (uint16_t s, uint16_t o);
>>
>> int
>> foo (uint8_t BiosInt)
>> {
>> uint16_t Segment;
>> uint16_t Offset;
>>
>> Segment = (uint16_t)(((uint32_t *)0)[BiosInt] >> 16);
>> Offset = (uint16_t)((uint32_t *)0)[BiosInt];
>>
>> return somefunc (Segment, Offset);
>> }
>>
>> If I compile this with:
>>
>> % clang -O2 -c edk.c
>>
>> then I get this:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
>> 0: 55 push %rbp
>> 1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 4: 0f 0b ud2
>>
>> If I compile with GCC instead:
>>
>> % gcc10 -O2 -c edk.c
>>
>> then I get this:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
>> 0: 40 0f b6 ff movzbl %dil,%edi
>> 4: 8b 3c bd 00 00 00 00 mov 0x0(,%rdi,4),%edi
>> b: 0f b7 f7 movzwl %di,%esi
>> e: c1 ef 10 shr $0x10,%edi
>> 11: e9 00 00 00 00 jmp 16 <foo+0x16>
>>
>> If I compile with Clang using -O0 to disable optimization, then it produces
>> code:
>>
>> 0000000000000000 <foo>:
>> 0: 55 push %rbp
>> 1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 4: 48 83 ec 10 sub $0x10,%rsp
>> 8: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> a: 89 c1 mov %eax,%ecx
>> c: 40 88 7d ff mov %dil,-0x1(%rbp)
>> 10: 0f b6 45 ff movzbl -0x1(%rbp),%eax
>> 14: 89 c2 mov %eax,%edx
>> 16: 8b 04 91 mov (%rcx,%rdx,4),%eax
>> 19: c1 e8 10 shr $0x10,%eax
>> 1c: 66 89 45 fc mov %ax,-0x4(%rbp)
>> 20: 0f b6 75 ff movzbl -0x1(%rbp),%esi
>> 24: 89 f2 mov %esi,%edx
>> 26: 8b 34 91 mov (%rcx,%rdx,4),%esi
>> 29: 66 89 75 fa mov %si,-0x6(%rbp)
>> 2d: 66 8b 45 fc mov -0x4(%rbp),%ax
>> 31: 0f b7 f8 movzwl %ax,%edi
>> 34: 0f b7 75 fa movzwl -0x6(%rbp),%esi
>> 38: e8 00 00 00 00 call 3d <foo+0x3d>
>> 3d: 48 83 c4 10 add $0x10,%rsp
>> 41: 5d pop %rbp
>> 42: c3 ret
>>
>> Note that this is with Clang 10.0.1, however I observe exactly the same
>> results with Clang 12.0.1.
>>
>> I was able to fix this locally (for both X64 and IA32 targets) this by doing
>> this:
>>
>> UINT16 Segment;
>> UINT16 Offset;
>> volatile UINT32 * Page0 = NULL;
>> [...]
>> ACCESS_PAGE0_CODE (
>> Segment = (UINT16)(Page0[BiosInt] >> 16);
>> Offset = (UINT16)Page0[BiosInt];
>> );
>>
>> Note that the addition of the volatile keyword seems to be the key. If you
>> wanted to make the change simpler, you could also just do this:
>>
>> ACCESS_PAGE0_CODE (
>> Segment = (UINT16)(((volatile UINT32 *)0)[BiosInt] >> 16);
>> Offset = (UINT16)((volatile UINT32 *)0)[BiosInt];
>> );
>>
>> (To my eyes, the other way is more readable, but others may disagree.)
>>
>> With these three issues fixed, I'm able to boot and run my OVMF.fd images
>> for both X64 and IA32, and they're able to also boot and run the loaders
>> and OS images that I'm testing.
>>
>> I'm not sure how much testing the CLANGDWARF toolspec is getting these days,
>> but maybe it should get a little more. Is there any chance these issues
>> could be addressed?
>>
>> -Bill
>
>
> --
> =============================================================================
> -Bill Paul (510) 749-2329 | VxWorks Software Architect,
> wpaul@windriver.com | Master of Unix-Fu - Wind River Systems
> =============================================================================
> "I put a dollar in a change machine. Nothing changed." - George Carlin
> =============================================================================
>
>
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 38714 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-13 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-10 20:56 Issues with CLANGDWARF tool specification and X64 -- am I nuts or what? Bill Paul
2022-01-11 18:02 ` [edk2-devel] " Bill Paul
2022-01-13 17:12 ` Andrew Fish [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=82BBE0CA-8378-4323-84CB-4AE023F6580D@apple.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox