From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io;
 dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 209.132.183.28, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by groups.io with SMTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 16:08:21 -0700
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E50259449;
	Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-117-23.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.23])
	by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8F26012D;
	Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:08:19 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/35] OvmfPkg/XenPlatformPei: Rework memory detection
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
 =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
 Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
 Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>,
 Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
References: <20190704144233.27968-1-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
 <20190704144233.27968-25-anthony.perard@citrix.com>
 <20190715141521.aqmpchgzyleoergc@MacBook-Air-de-Roger.local>
 <20190722145319.GG1208@perard.uk.xensource.com>
 <8b9cb231-e9e5-8f92-f8d4-a6f05efaa888@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <87f9398f-9ce6-7938-e321-cd97d68b85d6@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:08:18 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8b9cb231-e9e5-8f92-f8d4-a6f05efaa888@redhat.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.39]); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 23:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 07/22/19 21:45, Laszlo Ersek wrote:

> we place the 32-bit PCI IOMMU aperture based on [...]

Do I get a medal for this hugely confusing typo? :)

In earnest, I'm sorry about it -- my comment had nothing to do with
"IOMMU"; I meant "MMIO". (At least I got it right in the rest of the email.)

Sorry!
Laszlo