From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web12.706.1597469592573566796 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:33:12 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=RpdxUBIh; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=7wAi2y7V7mu2Qyt22H3zcpq56x1cXlr39AEwCfMQDPE=; b=RpdxUBIh8TIJuCkU4bKS1JOu3n XOspFqygtK+3cufTBDYUB7sjSYjtVU1gM0yziw0VO8o09dpNfFhBfbFSzb3ZFeQedV1J4xbPDdRvX oT3Jqt9K9FtLk1PCX+oIXqoxVyraousDpO7CnJJ09aVrflq2b9SDUbjkTjNuo+Y0zZ9U=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ooY-00F9A4-18; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:10 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1k6ooX-0002QA-9E; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:09 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED992161394; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:08 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id ZdVuSESsnQdD; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3C59160F36; Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:08 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , Matthew Carlson , devel@edk2.groups.io References: <13469.1597199256202235840@groups.io> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <890e27cf-8878-13fc-42ea-4e700228c208@bsdio.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 23:33:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1k6ooX-0002QA-9E;;;mid=<890e27cf-8878-13fc-42ea-4e700228c208@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa08.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.3 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, TooManyTo_001,TooManyTo_002,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5250] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * -0.0 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: ; sa08 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;Laszlo Ersek , Matthew Carlson , devel@edk2.groups.io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 465 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 14 (3.0%), b_tie_ro: 12 (2.6%), parse: 1.24 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 4.7 (1.0%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.54 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.1 (0.7%), tests_pri_-950: 1.67 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.39 (0.3%), tests_pri_-90: 73 (15.6%), check_bayes: 70 (15.1%), b_tokenize: 5 (1.1%), b_tok_get_all: 7 (1.4%), b_comp_prob: 1.77 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 51 (11.0%), b_finish: 1.62 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 351 (75.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.63 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 51 (10.9%), poll_dns_idle: 45 (9.6%), tests_pri_10: 3.6 (0.8%), tests_pri_500: 9 (2.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v4 3/5] OvmfPkg: Add RngLib based on TimerLib for Crypto X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 8/12/20 4:05 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Arguably, the "Pkg" infix in the following file names: > > Bhyve/BhyvePkgDefines.fdf.inc > Bhyve/BhyvePkgX64.dsc > Bhyve/BhyvePkgX64.fdf > > remains a bit confusing, and should indeed be removed: > > Bhyve/BhyveDefines.fdf.inc > Bhyve/BhyveX64.dsc > Bhyve/BhyveX64.fdf > > Rebecca, could you please submit a patch with such renames? Yes, I'll submit a patch in the next couple of days - I'm still catching up from traveling this past week. -- Rebecca Cran